Reconstruction of black hole metric perturbations from the Weyl curvature

Physical Review D

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2002, Pages

  Lousto, Carlos O ^a,b   Whiting, Bernard F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT BROWNSVILLE   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO DE ASTRONOMÍA Y FÍSICA DEL ESPACIO   (Argentina)

^c University of Florida ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLACK HOLE; CALCULATION; COSMOS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHYSICS; THEORY;

EID: 0037101256     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.024026     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. T. Regge and J. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957).
2. F.J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2141 (1970).
3. V. Moncrief, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 323 (1974).
4. C.O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5251 (2000).
5. C.O. Nicasio, R. Gleiser, and J. Pullin, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 32, 2021 (2000).
6. R.J. Gleiser, C.O. Nicasio, R.H. Price, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rep. 325, 41 (2000).
7. E. Newman and R. Penrose, J. Math. Phys. 3, 566 (1962).
8. S.A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973).
9. S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1983).
10. R.H. Price and J.R. Ipser, Phys. Rev. D 44, 307 (1991).
11. P.L. Chrzanowski, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2042 (1975).
12. J.M. Cohen and L.S. Kegeles, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1070 (1974).
13. R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 203 (1978).
14. L.S. Kegeles and J.M. Cohen, Phys. Rev. D 19, 1641 (1979).
15. M. Campanelli, C.O. Lousto, J. Baker, G. Khanna, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. D 58, 084019 (1998);
16. M. Campanelli, C.O. Lousto, J. Baker, G. Khanna, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. D 62, 069901(E) (2000).
17. M. Campanelli and C.O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124022 (1999).
18. J. Baker, B. Brugmann, M. Campanelli, C.O. Lousto, and R. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 121103 (2001).
19. J. Baker, M. Campanelli, C.O. Lousto, and R. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D 65, 124012 (2002).
20. J.N. Goldberg, A.J. MacFarlane, E.T. Newman, F. Rohrlich, and E.C.G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys. 8, 2155 (1967).
21. M. Campanelli and C.O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 58, 024015 (1998).
22. S. Chandrasekhar, Proc. R. Soc. London A392, 1 (1984).
23. R.M. Wald, J. Math. Phys. 14, 1453 (1973).
24. Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3457 (1997).
25. T.C. Quinn and R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3381 (1997).
26. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 64, 124003 (2001).
27. B.F. Whiting, J. Math. Phys. 30, 1301 (1989).
28. We have made the choice that ε=0.
29. For Newman-Penrose scalars, as in Eqs. (4.2)-(4.6), even and odd really refer to contributions to the real and imaginary parts of the whole scalar, not specifically to the individual coefficients in a mode sum decomposition.