Critical Behavior of Frustrated Josephson Junction Arrays with Bond Disorder

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2002, Pages

  Yun, Young Je ^a   Baek, In Cheol ^a   Choi, Mu Yong ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARRAYS; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRENT VOLTAGE CHARACTERISTICS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; QUENCHING;

JOSEPHSON JUNCTION ARRAYS (JJA);

JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES;

EID: 0037101012     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.037004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. Aizenman and J. Wehr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2503 (1989).
2. K. Hui and A. N. Berker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2507 (1989).
3. S. Chen, A. M. Ferrenberg, and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1213 (1992).
4. M. Kardar, A. L. Stella, G. Sartoni, and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. E 52, R1269 (1995).
5. C. Denniston and C. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 451 (1997).
6. X. S. Ling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2989 (1996).
7. Y.-H. Li and S. Teitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2894 (1991).
8. E. Granato and M. P. Nightingale, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7438 (1993);
9. Phys. Rev. B S. Lee and K.-C. Lee, ibid. 49, 15 184 (1994);
10. P. Olsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2758 (1995);
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. J. V. José and G. Ramirez-Santiago, ibid. 77, 4849 (1996), and references therein.
12. F. Yu, N. E. Israeloff, A. M. Goldman, and R. Bojko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2535 (1992).
13. The change in the (Formula presented) characteristics caused by the finite sample size, which has been found in the absence of a magnetic field serious enough to alter the scaling parameters considerably, is not significant in the presence of a magnetic field. For our sample with (Formula presented) at (Formula presented), (Formula presented), whereas (Formula presented), a part of which is due to the finite-size-induced vortices. It is probably because, in the presence of a magnetic field, the field-induced vortices greatly outnumber the finite-size-induced one.
14. D. S. Fisher, M. P. A. Fisher, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 43, 130 (1991).
15. D. R. Strachan, M. C. Sullivan, P. Fournier, S. P. Pai, T. Venkatesan, and C. J. Lobb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067007 (2001).
16. J. Holzer, R. S. Newrock, C. J. Lobb, T. Aouaroun, and S. T. Herbert, Phys. Rev. B 63, 184508 (2001).
17. Y.-H. Li and S. Teitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2595 (1990).
18. C. Denniston and C. Tang, Phys. Rev. B 60, 3163 (1999).
19. K. K. Mon and S. Teitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 673 (1989);
20. M. V. Simkin, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7899 (1998).
21. H. J. Luo, L. Schülke, and B. Zheng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 180 (1998);
22. S. J. Lee, J.-R. Lee, and B. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 51, R4 (1995).