Normal-Mode–Vortex Interactions

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2002, Pages

  Bernal, R ^a   Coste, C ^b   Lund, F ^c,d   Melo, F ^a,d  

^a Departamento de Física de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile   (United States)

^b Groupe de Physique des Solides   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^d CIMAT   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING; ATTENUATION; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PHONONS; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; QUASICRYSTALS; TURBULENT FLOW; VELOCITY; VISCOSITY; VORTEX FLOW;

BESSEL EQUATIONS;

SURFACE WAVES;

EID: 0037100883     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.034501     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. For a review, see Proceedings of the 2000 Cargese Summer School “Sound-Flow Interaction” (to be published).
2. For theoretical aspects, see R. H. Kraichnan, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 1096 (1953);
3. M. J. Lighthill, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 49, 531 (1953);
4. T. Kambe, J. Jpn. Soc. Fluid Mech. 1, 149 (1982) (in Japanese);
5. M. S. Howe, J. Sound. Vib. 87, 567 (1983);
6. A. L. Fabrikant, Sov. Phys. Acoust. 29, 152 (1983);
7. F. Lund and C. Rojas, Physica (Amsterdam) 37D, 508 (1989).
8. Experiments include C. Baudet, S. Ciliberto, and J. F. Pinton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 193 (1991);
9. M. Oljaca, Phys. Fluids A 10, 886 (1998).
10. P. Roux and M. Fink, Eur. Phys. Lett. D 32, 25 (1995);
11. R. Labbe and J.-F. Pinton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1413 (1998);
12. S. Manneville, Eur. J. Phys. B 9, 545 (1999);
13. S. Manneville, Phys. Fluids 11, 3380 (1999).
14. For a perspective on Helioseismology, the study of the suns interior through the observed surface oscillations due to resonant sound waves, see P. Demarque and D. B. Guenther, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5356 (1999);
15. see also G. Fiorentini, B. Ricci, and F. L. Villante, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) 95, 116 (2001).
16. R. Ford and S. Llewellyn Smith, J. Fluid Mech. 386, 305 (1999).
17. C. Coste, F. Lund, and M. Umeki, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4908 (1999);
18. C. Coste and F. Lund, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4917 (1999).
19. M. V. Berry, Eur. J. Phys. 1, 154 (1980).
20. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959).
21. For reviews, see I. Olariu and I. I. Popescu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 339 (1985);
22. M. Peshkin and A. Tonomura, The Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Lectures Notes in Physics Vol. 340 (Springer, Berlin,1989).
23. P. Roux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3170 (1997).
24. F. Vivanco, F. Melo, C. Coste, and F. Lund, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1966 (1999).
25. See E. Sonin, cond-mat/0104221 (to be published);
26. D. J. Thouless, Phys. Rev. B 63, 224 504 (2001).
27. By way of the well-known Faraday instability, a topic that has received much attention in recent years. For a review, see W. S. Edwards and S. Fauve, J. Fluid Mech. 278, 123 (1994), and references therein.
28. J. Bechhoefer, V. Ego, S. Manneville, and B. Johnson, J. Fluid Mech. 288, 235 (1995).
29. As shown in
30. As explained in Ref.