Comparing implicit, differential, dimensional, and Bogolubov-Parasiuk-Hepp- Zimmermann renormalization

Physical Review D

Volumn 65, Issue 12, 2002, Pages

  Sampaio, M ^a   Scarpelli, A P Baêta ^b   Hiller, B ^a   Brizola, A ^c   Nemes, M C ^c,d   Gobira, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE PETRÓPOLIS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DERIVATIZATION; MODEL; QUANTUM THEORY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037098322     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.125023     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. 84B, 193 (1979).
2. See, for instance, I. Jack and D.T.R. Jones, in Perspectives in Supersymmetry, edited by G. Kane (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), and references therein.
3. W. Siegel, Phys. Lett. 94B, 37 (1980).
4. N.N. Bogolyubov and D.V. Shirkov, Introduction to the Theory of the Quantised Fields (Wiley, New York, 1980);
5. K. Hepp, Commun. Math. Phys. 2, 301 (1966);
6. W. Zimmermann, Lectures on Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory, edited by S. Deser, M. Grisaru, and M. Pendleton (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1970);
7. J.H. Lowenstein, "BPHZ Renormalisation," in Renormalization Theory, Proceeding of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Erice, 1975, edited by G. Velo and A.S. Wightman (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975).
8. M. Gomes and B. Schroer, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3525 (1974);
9. J.H. Lowenstein, Commun. Math. Phys. 47, 53 (1976);
10. J.H. Lowenstein and P.K. Mitter, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 105, 138 (1977);
11. L.C. Albuquerque, M. Gomes, and A.J. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 62, 085005 (2000).
12. G. Dunne and N. Rius, Phys. Lett. B 293, 367 (1992).
13. D.Z. Freedman, K. Johnson, and J.I. Latorre, Nucl. Phys. B371, 353 (1992).
14. P.E. Haagensen and J.I. Latorre, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 221, 77 (1993).
15. M. Chaichian and W.F. Chen, Phys. Lett. B 409, 325 (1997);
16. W.F. Chen, H.C. Lee, and Z.Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3664 (1997);
17. D.Z. Freedman, G. Grignani, K. Johnson, and N. Rius, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 218, 75 (1992).
18. F. del Aguila, A. Culatti, R. Muñoz Tapia, and M. PérezVictoria, Nucl. Phys. B537, 561 (1999);
19. F. del Aguila, A. Culatti, R. Muñoz Tapia, and M. PérezVictoria, Nucl. Phys. B504, 532 (1997);
20. "Quantum effects in the minimal supersymmetric standard model," hep-ph/9711474.
21. M. Pérez-Victoria, Phys. Lett. B 442, 315 (1998).
22. F. del Águila and M. Pérez-Victoria, Acta Phys. Pol. B 29, 2857 (1998).
23. P.E. Haagensen and J.I. Latorre, Phys. Lett. B 283, 293 (1992).
24. P.E. Haagensen and J.I. Latorre, Phys. Lett. B 419, 263 (1998).
25. F. del Águila and M. Pérez-Victoria, hep-ph/9901291;
26. Acta Phys. Pol. B 28, 2279 (1997).
27. T. Hahn and M. Pérez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
28. O.A. Battistel, A.L. Mota, and M.C. Nemes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 1597 (1998).
29. O.A. Battistel, Ph.D. thesis, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
30. A.P. Baêta Scarpelli, M. Sampaio, and M.C. Nemes, Phys. Rev. D 63, 046004 (2001).
31. A.P. Baêta Scarpelli, M. Sampaio, M.C. Nemes, and B. Hiller, Phys. Rev. D 64, 046013 (2001).
32. A. Brizola, O.A. Battistel, M. Sampaio, and M.C. Nemes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 1509 (1999).
33. S.R. Gobira and M.C. Nemes, "Perturbative n-loop renormalization by an implicit regularization technique," hep-th/0102096.
34. O.A. Battistel and M.C. Nemes, Phys. Rev. D 59, 055010 (1999).
35. R. Jackiw, in Current Algebra and Anomalies, edited by S. Treiman, R. Jackiw, B. Zumino, and E. Witten (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985).
36. V.O. Rivelles, M. Sampaio, and M.C. Nemes (work in progress).
37. M.T. Grisaru, M. Rocek, and W. Siegel, Nucl. Phys. B159, 429 (1979).
38. See, for instance, M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
39. Because the QED vertex function is superficially logarithmically divergent, it must be momentum-routing independent.
40. A forest U of diagram G is the set of all subgraphs of G, including G itself, which are neither overlapping nor trivial.
41. p converges if 2m + 2p > 4 + 2i+k, 2n + 2p > 4 + 2j+k, m + n+p > i+j + k+4 and m+n>i+j+k+2 are satisfied.
42. In CDfR the dimensionful constants are taken from the logarithmic divergent pieces only [12].
43. 2.
44. J. Mas, M. Perez-Victoria, and C. Seijas, J. High Energy Phys. 03, 049 (2002).