Comparison of radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of appendicular osteosarcoma in dogs.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Volumn 220, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1171-1176

  Davis, Garrett J ^a   Kapatkin, Amy S ^a   Craig, Linden E ^a   Heins, Gregory S ^a   Wortman, Jeffre A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BONE TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOG; DOG DISEASE; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOSARCOMA; RADIOGRAPHY; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

AMPUTATION; ANIMALS; BONE NEOPLASMS; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; EVALUATION STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; OSTEOSARCOMA; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0037092109     PISSN: 00031488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.1171     Document Type: Article

References (0)