Emergency craniotomy for intracerebral hemorrhage: When doesn't it help and does it ever help?

Neurology

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 1325-1326

  Gebel, James M ^a   Powers, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CRANIOTOMY; EDITORIAL; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; HEMATOMA; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL;

EID: 0037076464     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.58.9.1325     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Failure of surgery to improve outcome in hypertensive putamenal hemorrhage: A prospective randomized trial
2. Rebleeding leads to poor outcome in ultra-early craniotomy for intracerebral hemorrhage
3. Surgical treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage (STICH): A single-center, randomized clinical trial
4. Primary intracerebralhemorrhage: A controlled trial of surgical and conservative treatment in 180 unselected cases
5. Early surgical treatment for supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: A randomized feasibility study
6. Emergency craniotomy in patients worsening due to expanded cerebral hematoma: To what purpose?
7. Age-related spontaneous intracerebral hematoma in a German community
8. Volume of ventricular blood is an important determinant of outcome in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage
9. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies