Inter- and intra-operator reliability of the recording of occlusal contacts using 'occlusal sketch' acetate technique

British Dental Journal

Volumn 193, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 397-400

  Davies, S J ^a   Gray, R J M ^a   Al Ani, M Z ^a   Sloan, P ^a   Worthington, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACETATES; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037068982     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801575     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Celenza F V, Nasedkin, J N. Occlusion. The state of the art. pp 31-41 Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc 1978
2. Gross M D, Mathews J D. Occlusion in restorative dentistry, pp 36-50. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1982.
3. Pameijer J H N Periodontal and occlusion factors in crown and bridge procedures. pp 41-45 Amesterdam: PBC, Dental center for postgraduate courses, 1985.
4. Dawson P E. Evaluation diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems. 2nd ed, pp 436 Missouri: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1989
5. Millstein P L. A permanent method of recording occlusal contacts J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53. 748-749
6. Fattore L-D, Malone W F, Sandrick J L, et al Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials J Prosthod Dent 1984; 51: 7.
7. Gazit E, Lieberman M A. Occlusal contacts following orthodontic treatment Measured by a Photocclusion technique Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 316-320
8. Ziebert G J, Donegan S J. Tooth contacts and stability before and after occlusal adjustment J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42: 276-281.
9. Ehrlich J, Taicher S. Intercuspal contacts of the natural dentition in centric occlusion J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45 419-421.
10. Millstein P L. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators A Descriptive, Qualitative Method Quintessence Int 1983, 8: 813-818
11. Berry D C Singh B P Daily variations in occlusal contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1983, 50. 286-391.
12. Berry D C, Singh B P Effect of electromyographic biofeedback therapy on occlusal contacts J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 379-403
13. Gazit E, Fitzig S, Lieberman M A. Reproducibility of occlusal marking technique J Prosthet Dent 1986, 55: 505-509
14. Durbin D S, Sadowsky C Changes in tooth contacts following orthodontic treatment Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986, 90: 375-382
15. Razodolsky Y, Sadowsky C, BeGole E A. Oeclusal con tacts following orthodontic treatment a follow-up study Angle Orthod 1989; 59: 181-186.
16. Haydar B, Ciòer S, Saatçi P. Occlusal contact changes after the active phase of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992, 102, 22-28
17. Maness W L, Benjamin M, Podoloff R, Bobic A, Golden R F Computerized occlusal analysis a new technology Quintessence Intl 1987, 18: 287-292
18. Hsu M, Palla S, Gallo L M. Sensitivity and reliability of the T-scan system for occlusal analysis J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1992;6 17-23.
19. Davies S J, Gray R J M, Smith P W. Good occlusal practice in simple restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2001; 191 365-381
20. Anderson G, Schulte J K, Aeppli D M Reliability of the evaluation of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prost Dent 1993, 70. 320-323
21. Landis J R, Koch G C. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33. 159-74