A super-grid-scale model for simulating compressible flow on unbounded domains

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 182, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 191-212

  Colonius, Tim ^a   Ran, Hongyu ^a  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE PROPAGATION; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

ABSORBING LAYERS; BUFFER REGION; COORDINATE MAPPING; EQUATION OF MOTION; FOURIER SPACE; GRID SCALE; SCALE-MODEL; SPONGE LAYERS; SUPERGRID; UNBOUNDED DOMAIN;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

EID: 0037058024     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7161     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. S. Abarbanel and D. D. Gottlieb, A mathematical analysis of the PML method, J. Comput. Phys. 134, 357 (1997).
2. S. Abarbanel, D. Gottlieb, and J. S. Hesthaven, Well-posed perfectly matched layers for advective acoustics, J. Comput. Phys. 154, 266 (1999).
3. S. C. Collis and S. K. Lele, A Computational Investigation of Receptivity in High-Speed Flow Near a Swept Leading Edge, Technical Report TF-71 (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1997).
4. T. Colonius, S. K. Lele, and P. Moin, Boundary conditions for direct computation of aerodynamic sound generation, AIAA J. 31(9), 1574 (1993).
5. T. Colonius, S. K. Lele, and P. Moin, The free compressible viscous vortex, J. Fluid Mech. 230, 45 (1991).
6. J. A. Domaradzki and E. M. Saiki, A subgrid-scale model based on the estimation of unresolved scales of turbulence, Phys. Fluids 9(7), 2148 (1997).
7. B. Engquist and A. Majda, Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comput. 31(139), 629 (1977).
8. J. B. Freund, Proposed inflow/outflow boundary condition for direct computation of aerodynamic sound, AIAA J. 35(4), 740 (1997).
9. J. B. Freund, Noise sources in a low-reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9, J. Fluid Mech. 438, 277 (2001).
10. M. B. Giles, Nonreflecting boundary-conditions for Euler equation calculations, AIAA J. 28(12), 2050 (1990).
11. J. W. Goodrich and T. Hagstrom, A Comparison of Two Accurate Boundary Treatments for Computational Aeroacoustics, AIAA Paper 97-1585 (1997).
12. Y. Guo, N. A. Adams, and L. Kleiser, Direct numerical simulation of transition in a spatially growing compressible boundary layer using a new fourier method, in Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation, edited by P. R. Voke, L. Kleiser, and J.-P. Chollet (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht/Norwell, MA, 1994), Vol. 1, p. 249.
13. J. S. Hesthaven, P. G. Dinesen, and J. P. Lynov, Spectral collocation time-domain modeling of diffractive optical elements, J. Comput. Phys. 155, 287 (1999).
14. M. Israeli and S. A. Orszag, Approximation of radiation boundary condition, J. Compt. Phys. 41, 115 (1981).
15. M. Klocker, U. Konzelmann, and H. Fasel, Outflow boundary conditions for spatial Navier-Stokes simulations of transitional boundary layers, AIAA J. 31, 620 (1993).
16. S. K. Lele, Compact finite-difference schemes with spectral-like resolution, J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16 (1992).
17. A. Leonard, Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, Adv. Geophys. 18, 237 (1974).
18. A. Leonard and G. S. Winckelmans, A tensor-diffusivity subgrid model for large-eddy simulation, in Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation III, edited by P. R. Voke, N. D. Sandham, and L. Kleiser (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht/Norwell, MA, 1999), p. 147.
19. C. Meneveau and J. Katz, Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 1 (2000).
20. P. Moeleker and A. Leonard, Lagrangian methods for the tensor-diffusivity subgrid model, J. Comput. Phys. 167, 1 (2001).
21. K. Mohseni, H. Ran, and T. Colonius, Numerical experiments on vortex formation, J. Fluid Mech. 430, 267 (2001).
22. J. Nordström, N. Nordin, and D. Henningson, The fringe region technique and the Fourier method used in the direct numerical simulation of spatially evolving viscous flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20(4), 1365 (1999).
23. T. J. Poinsot and S. K. Lele, Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows, J. Comput. Phys. 101, 104 (1992).
24. M. Rai and P. Moin, Direct simulations of turbulent flow using finite-difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 96, 15 (1991).
25. M. Rosenfeld, E. Rambod, and M. Gharib, Circulation and formation number of laminar vortex rings, J. Fluid Mech. 376, 297 (1998).
26. C. W. Rowley and T. Colonius, Discretely nonreflecting boundary conditions for linear hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys. 157, 500 (2000).
27. P. R. Spalart, Direct numerical study of leading edge contamination, in Fluid Dynamics of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Shear Flows and Transition (AGARD, Cesme, Turkey, 1988), Vol. AGARD-CP-438, p. 5. 1.
28. S. Stolz and N. A. Adams, An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation, Phys. Fluids 11(7), 1699 (1999).
29. S. Taasan and D. M. Nark, An Absorbing Buffer Zone Technique of Acoustic Wave Propagation, AIAA Paper 95-0164 (1995).
30. C. K. W. Tam, Advances in Numerical Boundary Conditions for Computational Aeroacoustics, AIAA Paper 97-1774 (1997).
31. K. W. Thompson, Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys. 68, 1 (1987).
32. K. W. Thompson, Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, II, J. Comput. Phys. 89, 439 (1990).
33. L. N. Trefethen, Group velocity in finite difference schemes, SIAM Rev. 24(2), 113 (1982).
34. B. Yang, D. Gottlieb, and J. S. Hesthaven, Spectral simulations of electromagnetic wave scattering, J. Comput. Phys. 134, 216 (1997).