Docking of flexible molecules using multiscale ligand representations

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 45, Issue 21, 2002, Pages 4639-4646

  Glick, Meir ^a   Grant, Guy H ^a   Richards, W Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; LIGAND BINDING; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; HIV-1 REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE; HYDROLASES; ISOMERASES; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PERIPLASMIC BINDING PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0037057576     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm020830i     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Service, R. F. Structural genomics offers high-speed look at proteins. Science 2000, 287, 1954-1956.
2. Sali, A. Target practice. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 482-484.
3. Glick, M.; Grant, G. H.; Richards W. G. Pinpointing anthraxtoxin inhibitors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 118-119.
4. Williams, S. C. Biotechnology match making: screening orphan ligands and receptors. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 42-46.
5. Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Automated Docking with Grid-Based Energy Evaluation. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 505-524.
6. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
7. Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. Protein Eng. 1993, 6, 723-732.
8. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
9. Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1990, 8, 195-202.
10. Metropolis, N.; Rosenbluth, A. W.; Rosenbluth, M. N.; Teller, A. H.; Teller, E. J. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 1087-1094.
11. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D., Jr; Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220, 671-680.
12. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 254, 43-53.
13. Jones, G.; Willet, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
14. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Huey, R.; Olson, A. J. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 293-304.
15. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
16. Osterberg, F.; Morris, G. M.; Sanner, M. F.; Olson, A. J. Goodsell, D. S. Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2002, 46, 34-40.
17. Miranker, A.; Karplus, M. Functionality maps of binding sites: a multiple copy simultaneous search method. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1991, 11, 29-34.
18. Wade, R. C.; Goodford, P. J. Further development of hydrogen bond functions for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. 1. Ligand probe groups with the ability to form two hydrogen bonds. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 140-147.
19. Wade, R. C.; Goodford, P. J. Further development of hydrogen bond functions for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. 2. Ligand probe groups with the ability to form more than two hydrogen bonds. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 148-156.
20. Glick, M.; Robinson, D. D.; Grant, G. H.; Richards, W. G. Identification of Ligand Binding Sites on Proteins Using a Multi-Scale Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2337-2344.
21. MSI, San Diego, CA.
22. Ren, J.; Esnouf, R.; Garman, E.; Somers, D.; Kirby, C. R. I.; Keeling, J.; Darby, G.; Jones, Y.; Stuart, D. I.; Stammers, D. High-resolution structures of HIV-1 RT from four RT-inhibitor complexes. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2, 293-302.
23. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
24. Wu, T. P.; Padmanabhan, K.; Tulinsky, A.; Mulichak, A. M. The refined structure of the epsilon-aminocaproic acid complex of human plasminogen kringle 4. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 10589-10594.
25. Weber, P. C.; Ohlendorf, D. H.; Wendolski, J. J.; Salemme, F. R. Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. Science 1989, 243, 85-88.
26. Lisgarten, J. N.; Gupta, V.; Maes, D.; Wyns, L.; Zegers, I.; Palmer, R. A.; Dealwis, C. G.; Aguilar, C. F.; Hemmings, A. M. Structure of the crystalline complex of cytidylic acid (2′-CMP) with ribonuclease at 1.6 Å resolution. Conservation of solvent sites in RNase-A high-resolution structures. Acta Crystallogr. 1993, D49, 541-547.
27. Carrell, H. L.; Hoier, H.; Glusker, J. P. Modes of binding substrates and their analogues to the enzyme D-xylose isomerase. Acta Crystallogr. 1994, D50, 113-123.
28. Padlan, E. A.; Cohen, G. H.; Davies, D. R. On the specificity of antibody 3-antigen interactions-phosphocholine binding to MCPC603 and the correlation of 3-dimensional structure and sequence data. Ann. Immunol. Sect. C 1985, 136, 271-276.
29. Yao, N.; Trakhanov, S.; Quiocho, F. A. Refined 1.89-Å structure of the histidine-binding protein complexed with histidine and its relationship with many other active transport/chemosensory proteins. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 4769-4779.
30. Carlson, H. A.; McCammon, J. A. Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000, 57, 213-218.
31. Watkins, R. E.; Wisely, G. B.; Moore, L. B.; Collins, J. L.; Lambert, M. H.; Williams, S. P.; Willson, T. M.; Kliewer, S. A.; Redinbo, M. R. Science 2001, 292, 2329-2333.
32. Carrell, H. L.; Glusker, J. P.; Burger, V.; Manfre, F.; Tritsch, D.; Biellmann, J. F. X-ray analysis of D-xylose isomerase at 1.9 Å: native enzyme in complex with substrate and with a mechanism-designed inactivator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86, 4440-4444.
33. Glick, M.; Goldblum, A. A Novel Energy-Based Stochastic Method for Positioning Polar Protons in Protein Structures from X-rays. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2000, 38, 273-287.
34. Glick, M.; Rayan, A.; Goldblum, A. A stochastic algorithm for global optimization and for best populations: A test case of side chains in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 703-708.
35. Bravi, G.; Gancia, E.; Zaliani, A.; Pegna, M. SONHICA Simple Optimized Non-Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: a new tool for analysis of molecular conformations. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1295-1311.
36. Leach, A. R.; Kuntz, I. D. Conformational Analysis of Flexible Ligands in Macromolecular Receptor Sites. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 730-748.
37. Chen, X.; Rusinko, A., III; Tropsha, A.; Young, S. S. Automated pharmacophore identification for large chemical data sets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 887-896.