|
Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 116-119
|
Prepidil® compared to Propess® for cervical ripening
a a a |
Author keywords
Cervical ripening; Cost effectiveness; Labour induction; Prostaglandin E 2
|
Indexed keywords
PROSTAGLANDIN E2;
ADULT;
AMNION;
ARTICLE;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CONTROLLED DRUG RELEASE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DELIVERY;
FEMALE;
GEL;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LABOR INDUCTION;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEMBRANE RUPTURE;
PREGNANCY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
UTERINE CERVIX RIPENING;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DRUG EFFECT;
FETUS HEART RATE;
GESTATIONAL AGE;
HYPERTENSION;
INTRAVAGINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
MALE;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATION;
PREGNANCY OUTCOME;
PROLONGED PREGNANCY;
UTERINE CERVIX;
ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL;
ADULT;
CERVICAL RIPENING;
CERVIX UTERI;
CESAREAN SECTION;
DINOPROSTONE;
FEMALE;
GESTATIONAL AGE;
HEART RATE, FETAL;
HUMANS;
HYPERTENSION;
LABOR, INDUCED;
MALE;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, CARDIOVASCULAR;
PREGNANCY OUTCOME;
PREGNANCY, PROLONGED;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 0037055960
PISSN: 03012115
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00069-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (34)
|
References (11)
|