|
|
Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2002, Pages
|
|
Exercise does not protect the female heart: an unconvincing conclusion?
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
CARDIOTONIC AGENT;
HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70;
ANIMAL;
EXERCISE;
FEMALE;
HEART VENTRICLE PRESSURE;
METABOLISM;
NOTE;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PHYSIOLOGY;
RAT;
REPERFUSION INJURY;
SEX DIFFERENCE;
ANIMALS;
CARDIOTONIC AGENTS;
EXERTION;
FEMALE;
HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS;
MYOCARDIAL REPERFUSION INJURY;
RATS;
SEX FACTORS;
VENTRICULAR PRESSURE;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0037047412
PISSN: None
EISSN: 15244571
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.0000029423.88400.52 Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
