Modeling the NO+H2 reaction on a Pt field emitter tip: Mean-field analysis and Monte Carlo simulations

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 117, Issue 22, 2002, Pages 10244-10257

  De Decker, Y ^a   Baras, F ^a,b   Kruse, N ^a   Nicolis, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; PLATINUM; REACTION KINETICS;

FIELD EMITTER TIP; FIELD ION MICROSCOPY; MEAN FIELD ANALYSIS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0037045161     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1518961     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. R. Imbihl and G. Ertl, Chem. Rev. 95, 697 (1995).
2. A. S. Mikhailov, Physica A 263, 329 (1999).
3. M. Hildebrand and A. S. Mikhailov, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19089 (1996).
4. A. G. Makeev and B. E. Nieuwenhuys, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 3740 (1998).
5. R. Imbihl, M. P. Cox, G. Ertl, H. Müller, and W. Brenig, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1578 (1985).
6. V. P. Zhdanov, Surf. Sci. 426, 345 (1999).
7. A. G. Makeev and B. E. Nieuwenhuys, Surf. Sci. 418, 432 (1998).
8. O. Kortlüke, V. N. Kuzovkov, and W. von Niessen, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 11523 (1999).
9. Yu. Suchorski, J. Beben, R. Imbihl, E. W. James, D.-J. Liu, and J. W. Evans, Phys. Rev. B 63, 165417 (2001).
10. F. Baras, G. Nicolis, M. Malek Mansour, and J. W. Turner, J. Stat. Phys. 32, 1 (1983).
11. P. Peeters, F. Baras, and G. Nicolis, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 7321 (1990).
12. R. M. Ziff, E. Gulari, and Y. Barshad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2553 (1986).
13. E. V. Albano, Heterog. Chem. Rev. 3, 389 (1996).
14. R. M. Nieminem and A. P. J. Jansen, Appl. Catal., A 160, 99 (1997).
15. V. P. Zhdanov and B. Kasemo, Surf. Sci. Rep. 39, 25 (2000).
16. E. Clément, P. Leroux-Hugon, and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1661 (1991).
17. D. S. Sholl and R. T. Skodje, Phys. Rev. E 53, 335 (1996).
18. S. Prakash and G. Nicolis, J. Stat. Phys. 82, 297 (1996).
19. S. Prakash and G. Nicolis, J. Stat. Phys. 86, 1289 (1997).
20. R. Dickman, Phys. Rev. A 34, 4246 (1986).
21. C. Voss and N. Kruse, Appl. Surf. Sci. 87/88, 127 (1994).
22. N. Khrustova, G. Veser, A. Mikhailov, and R. Imbihl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3564 (1995).
23. P. D. Cobden, C. A. de Wolf, M. Yu. Smirnov, A. Makeev, and B. E. Nieuwenhuys, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 158, 115 (2000).
24. G. Kalosakas and A. Provata, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066126 (2001).
25. M. Gaussmann and N. Kruse, Catal. Lett. 10, 305 (1991).
26. T. Visart de Bocarmé and N. Kruse, Chaos 12, 1 (2002).
27. T. D. Chau et al. (unpublished).
28. M. Slinko, T. Fink, T. Löher, H. H. Madden, S. J. Lombardo, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 264, 157 (1992).
29. (ads) desorbs instantaneously, neglecting second-order molecularity.
30. H. P. Bonzel, G. Brodén, and G. Pirug, J. Catal. 53, 96 (1978).
31. R. J. Gorte, L. D. Schmidt, and J. L. Gland, Surf. Sci. 109, 367 (1981).
32. M. A. Barteau, E. I. Ko, and R. J. Madix, Surf. Sci. 102, 99 (1981).
33. B. Pennemann, K. Oster and K. Wandelt, Surf. Sci. 249, 35 (1991).
34. A more sophisticated development must then be carried out around the values of both the critical coverage and pressures.
35. R. M. Ziff and B. J. Brosilow, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4630 (1992).
36. J. W. Evans, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1281 (1993).
37. K. Fichthorn, E. Gulari, and R. Ziff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1527 (1989).
38. Simulations show indeed that, in average, the interface between the considered states propagates with a constant velocity.
39. J. Wintterlin, S. Völkening, T. V. W. Janssens, T. Zambelli, and G. Ertl, Science 278, 1931 (1997).
40. S. Völkening and J. Wintterlin, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6382 (2001).