-
1
-
-
0037132755
-
Births: Final data for 2000
-
Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2002
-
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Park MM. Births: final data for 2000. National and vital statistics reports. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 2002. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr50/nvsr50_05.pdf.
-
National and Vital Statistics Reports
-
-
Martin, J.A.1
Hamilton, B.E.2
Ventura, S.J.3
Menacker, F.4
Park, M.M.5
-
2
-
-
0031714128
-
Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 to 1994
-
Gregory K, Curtin S, Taffel S, Notzon F. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 to 1994. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1384-87.
-
(1998)
Am J Public Health
, vol.88
, pp. 1384-1387
-
-
Gregory, K.1
Curtin, S.2
Taffel, S.3
Notzon, F.4
-
3
-
-
0003522087
-
-
Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
-
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Evaluation of cesarean delivery. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2000.
-
(2000)
Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery
-
-
-
5
-
-
0034875857
-
Vaginal birth after cesarean: A health policy perspective
-
Sachs B. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a health policy perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001;44:553-60.
-
(2001)
Clin Obstet Gynecol
, vol.44
, pp. 553-560
-
-
Sachs, B.1
-
6
-
-
0031863003
-
Vaginal birth after cesarean
-
McMahon M. Vaginal birth after cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 41:369-81
-
(1998)
Clin Obstet Gynecol
, vol.41
, pp. 369-381
-
-
McMahon, M.1
-
7
-
-
0003547620
-
-
Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, (NIH publication no. 82-2067)
-
National Institutes of Health. Cesarean childbirth. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 1981. (NIH publication no. 82-2067).
-
(1981)
Cesarean Childbirth
-
-
-
8
-
-
0032754793
-
Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California
-
Gregory KD, Korst LM, Cane PC, Platt LD, Katherine K. Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:985-9.
-
(1999)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.94
, pp. 985-989
-
-
Gregory, K.D.1
Korst, L.M.2
Cane, P.C.3
Platt, L.D.4
Katherine, K.5
-
10
-
-
0032521391
-
Are we underestimating vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth? The validity of delivery methods from birth certificates
-
Green DC, Moore JM, Adams MM, Berg CJ, Wilcox LS, McCarthy BJ. Are we underestimating vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth? The validity of delivery methods from birth certificates. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:581-5.
-
(1998)
Am J Epidemiol
, vol.147
, pp. 581-585
-
-
Green, D.C.1
Moore, J.M.2
Adams, M.M.3
Berg, C.J.4
Wilcox, L.S.5
McCarthy, B.J.6
|