Loudness of sharply (2068 dB/octave) filtered noises in relation to the factors extracted from the autocorrelation function

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 250, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 47-52

  Sato, S ^a   Kitamura, T ^a   Ando, Y ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BANDPASS FILTERS; BANDWIDTH; CORRELATION METHODS; REVERBERATION;

AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION; LOUDNESS;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 0037033862     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3888     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Y. Ando, S. Sato and H. Sakai 1999 in Computational Architectural Acoustics in Architecture (J. J. Sendra, editor), Chap. 4. Southampton: WIT Press. Fundamental subjective attributes of sound fields based on the model of auditory-brain system.
2. Y. Ando 2001 Journal of Sound and Vibration 241, 3-18. A theory of primary sensations and spatial sensations measuring environmental noise.
3. Igde N. Merthayasa, H. Hemmi and Y. Ando 1994 Memoirs of Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University 12A, 147-156. Loudness of a 1 kHz pure tone and sharply (1080 dB/Oct.) filtered noises centered on its frequency.
4. K. Ono and Y. Ando 1996 Reports of Architectural Institute of Japan, Kinki Chapter, 121-124, A study on loudness of sound field in relation to the reverberation time (in Japanese).
5. E. Zwicker, G. Flottorp and S. S. Stevens 1957 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29, 548-557. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation.
6. D. D. Greenwood 1961 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 484-502. Auditory masking and critical band.
7. D. D. Greenwood 1961 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 1344-1356. Critical bandwidth and the frequency of the basilar membrane.
8. B. Scharf 1962 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34, 228-233. Loudness summation and spectrum shape.
9. M. V. Mathews and S. M. Pfafflin 1965 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 38, 1055-1056. Effect of filter type on energy-detection models for auditory signal detection.
10. Y. Ando 1998 Architectural Acoustics, Blending Sound Sources, Sound Fields, and Listeners, Chap. 5. New York: AIP Pres/Singer-Verlag.
11. Y. Katsuki, T. Sumi, H. Uchiyama and T. Watanabe 1958 Journal of Neurophysiology 21, 569-588. Electric responses of auditory neurons in cat to sound stimulation.
12. L. L. Thurstone 1927 Psychology Review 31, 273-289. A law of comparative judgment.
13. F. Mosteller 1951 Psychometrica 16, 207-218. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed.
14. M. Inoue, Y. Ando and T. Taguti 2001 Journal of Sound and Vibration 241, 105-116. The frequency range applicable to pitch identification based upon the autocorrelation function model.
15. S. Sato, T. Kitamura, H. Sakai and Y. Ando 2001 Journal of Sound and Vibration 241, 97-103. The loudness of "complex noise" in relation to the factors extracted from the autocorrelation function.