Annoyance and spectral contrast are cues for similarity and preference of sounds

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 250, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 53-64

  Berglund, B ^a   Hassmen P ^a   Preis, A ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; ACOUSTIC VARIABLES CONTROL; ACOUSTIC WAVE EFFECTS; PRESSURE;

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING; SOUND PRESSURE; SPECTRAL CONTRAST;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

EID: 0037033859     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3889     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J. C. Baird, K. Harder and A. Preis 1997 Journal of Environmental Psychology 17, 333-343. Annoyance and community noise: psychophysical model of dose-response relationship.
2. B. Berglund and T. Lindvall (editors). 1995 Archives of the Center for Sensory Research 2, 1-95. Community noise.
3. J. S. Bradley 1994 NEF validation study: (2) review of aircraft noise and its effects. Institute for Research in Construction at the National Research Council of Canada, Contract Report A-1505.5 (Final).
4. G. Jansen and D. Gottlob 1996 in: Requirements for the Protection Against Outdoor Noise in Various Countries with Respect to Standardization and Regulations (F. A. Hill and R. Lawrence, editors) Vol. 6, pp. 3343-3348. St. Albans: Institute of Acoustics. Inter-Noise 96.
5. P. J. Stallen and I. H. Flindell 1999 Noise & Health 3, 1-79. Special issue: environmental noise and non-acoustical determinants of annoyance.
6. WHO 2000 Guidelines for Community Noise (B. Berglund, T. Lindvall, D. H. Schwela and K.-T. Goh, editors) Geneva: World Health Organization.
7. B. Berglund, U. Berglund and T. Lindvall 1976 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60, 1119-1125. Scaling loudness, noisiness and annoyance of community noises.
8. B. Berglund, A. Preis and K. Rankin 1990 Environment International 16, 523-531. Relationship between loudness and annoyance for ten community sounds.
9. A. Preis 1995 Archives of the Center for Sensory Research 2, 1-57. Noise annoyance and its components.
10. B. Berglund P. Hassmén and R. F. S. Job 1996 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99, (Part 1), 2985-3002. Sources and effects of low-frequency noise.
11. ISO 1975 Acoustics-Method for Calculating Loudness Level. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, International Standard ISO 532-1975(E).
12. E. Zwicker 1960 Acustica 10, 304-308. Ein Verfahren zur Berechnung der Lautstärke [A procedure for calculating loundess].
13. W. Aures 1985 Acustica 59, 130-141. Berechnungsverfahren für den Sensorichen Wohlklang Beliebiger Schallsignale.
14. S. Handel 1995 in Timbre Perception and Auditory Object Identification (B. C. J. Moore, editor) pp. 425-428. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Hearing.
15. A. Preis 1998 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103, (Part 2), 2850. Spectrum contrast and noise annoyance.
16. A. M. Simpson, B. C. J. Moore and B. R. Glasberg 1990 Acta Otolaryngology (Stockh) 469 (Suppl.), 101-107. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
17. R. B. Zajonc 1980 American Psychologist 35, 151-175. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences.
18. L. Sjöberg, C. Derbaix and B. Jansson 1987 Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 28, 56-68. Preference and similarity: affective and cognitive judgement?
19. E. Zwicker and H. Fastl 1990 Psychoacoustics. Facts and Models. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. A. Preis 1997 Study on annoyance - the importance of pitch strength. Proceedings from the Autumn Meeting (September, 1997), pp. 711-712. Sapporo, Japan: The Acoustical Society of Japan.
21. B. Berglund and A. Preis 1997 Acustica/Acta Acustica 83, 313-319. Is perceived annoyance more subject dependent than perceived loudness?
22. R. Nowak 1994 M.Sc. Thesis, Institute of Acoustics. Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland. Loudness and annoyance of sounds with different spectral envelope shape.
23. J. D. Carroll, 1972 in Individual Differences and Multidimensional Scaling (R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney and S. Nerlove, editor). New York: Academic Press. Multidimensional scaling: theory and applications in behavioral sciences.
24. S. S. Shiffman, M. L. Reynolds and F. W. Young 1981 Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling. Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Academic Press.
25. J. D. Carroll and J. J. Chang 1970 Psychometrika 35, 283-319. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of "Eckhart-Young" decomposition.
26. G. Ekman, T. Engen, T. Künnapas and R. A. Lindman 1964 Journal of Experimental Psychology 68, 530-536. A quantitative principle of qualitative similarity.
27. M. S. Kahn, O. Johansson and U. Sundbäck 1997 Noise Control Engineering Journal 45, 157-167. Development of an annoyance index for heavy-duty diesel engine noise using multivariate analysis.