Studies toward the Total Synthesis of Diterpene Antibiotic Guanacastepene A: Construction of the Hydroazulenic Core

Organic Letters

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 1063-1064

  Mehta, Goverdhan ^a   Umarye, Jayant D ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; CYCLOPENTANE DERIVATIVE; DITERPENE; DYES, REAGENTS, INDICATORS, MARKERS AND BUFFERS; GUANACASTEPENE A;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SYNTHESIS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; CYCLOPENTANES; DITERPENES; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR;

EID: 0037018479     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol017098m     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. (a) Brady, S. F.; Singh, M. P.; Janso, J. E.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2116.
2. (b) Brady, S. F.; Bondi, S. M.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9900.
3. (c) Singh, M. P.; Janso, J. E.; Luckman,. S. W.; Brady, S. F.; Clardy, J.; Greenstein, M.; Maiese, W. M. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 256.
4. (a) Snider, B. B.; Hawryluk, N. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 569.
5. (b) Magnus, P.; Waring, M. J.; Ollivier, C.; Lynch, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4947.
6. (c) Dudley, G. B.; Danishefsky, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2399.
7. (d) Dudley, G. B.; Tan, D. S.; Kim, G.; Tanski, J. M.; Danishefsky, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6789.
8. (a) Mehta, G.; Krishnamurthy, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5945.
9. (b) Mehta, G.; Krishnamurthy, N.; Karra, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5765.
10. Bowden, B. F.; Coll, J. C.; Mitchell, S. J.; Stokie, G. J.; Blount, J. F. Aust. J. Chem. 1978, 31, 2039.
11. (a) Rosenblum, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 3179.
12. (b) Woodward, R. B.; Katz, T. Tetrahedron. 1959, 5, 70.
13. +).
14. (a) Piers, E.; Renaud, J.; Rettig, S. J. Synthesis 1998, 590.
15. (b) Posner, G. H.; Sterling, J. J.; Whitten, C. E.; Lentz, C. M.; Brunelle, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 107.
16. +).
17. It was not considered necessary to separate the diastereomers formed during the allylation of 5 as it was anticipated that the subsequent α-methylation would deliver the methyl addition from the exo-face, and this indeed turned out to be the case.
18. (a) Stork, G.; Nelson, G. L.; Rouessac, F.; Gringore, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 3091.
19. (b) Wiel, J.-B.; Rouessac, F. J. C. S. Chem. Comm. 1976, 446.
20. (c) Review: Ogaswara, K. Pure. Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 2119.