Supportive evidence is lacking for report on animal studies [12]

British Medical Journal

Volumn 325, Issue 7371, 2002, Pages 1038-1039

  Pound, Pandora ^a   Ebrahim, Shah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL USE; DISEASE MODEL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; LETTER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; STANDARD;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GREAT BRITAIN;

EID: 0037010363     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Dobson, R, Lords support animal experiments but call for alternatives. BMJ 2002;325:238.
2. House of Lords, Select Committee on Animals in Scientific Procedures. 16 July 2002. House of Lords. London: Stationery, Office, 2002.
3. House of Lords, Animals in Scientific Procedures. Available at: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldanimal.html (accessed 9 October 2002).
4. Horn J, De Haan RJ, Vermeulen M. Luiten PG, Limburg M. Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: A systematic review. Stroke 2001;32:2433-8.
5. Shapiro KJ. Animal Models of Human Psycholgy. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber, 1998.