The effect of some beverages on the perception of succeeding basic tastes

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 571-581

  Ahn, Nina ^a   Frøst, Michael Bom ^a   Frandsen, Lise Wolf ^a   Dijksterhuis, Garmt ^a,b   Martens, Magni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEVERAGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PH;

TASTE INTENSITIES;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

COLA;

EID: 0037002358     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2002.tb00366.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ASTM. 1981. STP 758. Guidelines for the selection and training of sensory panel members. West Conshohocken, PA.
2. ASTM. 1986. STP 913. Physical requirement guidelines for sensory evaluation laboratories. West Conshohocken, PA.
3. BOM FRØST, M., DIJKSTERHUIS, G.B. and MARTENS, M. 2001. Sensory perception of fat in milk. Food Qual. Pref. 12, 327-336.
4. Brewery Society and Danish Soft Drinks Manufacturers (Bryggeriforeningen og Danske Laeskedrik Fabrikanter) 1999. Tal fra Bryggeriforeningen 1999.
5. DIJKSTERHUIS, G.B. and PIGGOTT, J.R. 2001. Dynamic Sensory Measurements. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 11, 284-290.
6. FIZZ. 1988. Version 1.30, Biosystemes, Couternon, France.
7. HARALDSDÓTTIR, J., HALKJÆR, J., HOLM, L., STENDER, S. and ASTRUP, A. 1999. Changes in the populations food consumption 1995-1998. The Danish Nutrition Council, Copenhagen, Denmark.
8. HELLEMANN, U., BARYLKO PIKIELNA, N. and MATUSZEWSKA, I. 1990. Interaction between bread and butter with varying NaCl contents: hedonic responses and sensory characteristics. Food Qual. Pref. 2.3, 167-176.
9. ISO. 1988. International Standard 8589. Sensory analysis - general guidance for the design of test rooms. Geneva.
10. ISO. 1991. International Standard 3972. Sensory analysis - methodology method of investigating sensitivity of taste. Geneva.
11. ISO. 1993. International Standard 8586-1. Sensory analysis - general guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Part 1: Selected assessors. Geneva.
12. MACFIE, H.J.H. and LIU, Y.H. 1992. Developments in analysis of time-intensity curves. Food Technol. 46, 92-97.
13. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
14. NYGREN, I.T., GUSTAFSSON, I.-B., HAGLUND, Å, JOHANSSON, L. and NOBLE, A.C. 2001. Flavor changes produced by wine and food interactions: Chardonnay wine and hollandaise sauce. J. Sensory Studies 16(5), 461-470.
15. O'MAHONY, M., GOLDENBERG, M., STEDMON, J. and ALFORD, J. 1979. Confusion in the use of the taste adjectives 'sour' and 'bitter'. Chemical Senses Flav. 4, 301-318.
16. SPSS. 2001. 9.0.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago.