Can Person-Centered Planning Be Empirically Analyzed to the Satisfaction of All Stakeholders?

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 268-271

  Halle, James W ^a   Lowrey, K Alisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037001224     PISSN: 15407969     EISSN: 21692408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2511/rpsd.27.4.268     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Braddock D. Hemp R. Rizzolo M. Parish S. Pomeranz A. (2002). The state of the states in developmental disabilities: 2002 study summary. Retrieved November 4, 2002 from http://www.cu.edu/Colemaninstitute/stateofthestates/chapabs.htm.
2. Carnine D., (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–521.
3. Dunn L. M., (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable? Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
4. Glaser B. Strauss A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
5. Holburn S. (2002). How science can evaluate and enhance person-centered planning. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 250–260.
6. House E. R. Howe K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. O'Brien J. O'Brien C. L. Mount B. (1997). Person-centered planning has arrived… or has it? Mental Retardation, 35, 480–488.
8. Slavin R. E. (1989). PET and the pendulum: Faddism in education and how to stop it. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 752–758.
9. Stake R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Will M. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–416.