Psychosocial risk factors for heart disease in France and North Ireland: The prospective epidemiological study of myocardial infarction (PRIME)

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1227-1234

  Sykes, D H ^a   Arveiler, D ^b   Salters, C P ^a   Ferrieres, J ^c   McCrum, E ^a   Amouyel, P ^c   Bingham, A ^c   Montaye, M ^c   Ruidavets, J B ^c   Haas, B ^b   Ducimetiere, P ^c   Evans, A E ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Coronary heart disease; Depression; France; Hostility; Northern Ireland; Social support; TABP

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE;

ADULT; AGE; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FATALITY; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART INFARCTION; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TYPE A BEHAVIOR; UNITED KINGDOM; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRANCE; HOSTILITY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NORTHERN IRELAND; PERSONALITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0036996014     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1227     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Renaud S, De Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet 1992;339:1523-26.
2. Tunstall-Pedoe H. Autres pays, autre moeurs. Theories on why the French have less heart disease than the British. BMJ 1988;297:1559-60.
3. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mahonen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10 year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populations. Lancet 1999;353:1547-57.
4. The PRIME Study Group. The PRIME Study: classical risk factors do not explain the severalfold differences in risk of coronary heart disease between France and Northern Ireland. Quart J Med 1998;91:667-76.
5. Stewart AW, Kuulasmaa K. Ecological analysis of the association between mortality and major risk factors of cardiovascular disease. Int J Epidemiol 1994;23:505-16.
6. Kuulasmaa K, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Dobson A et al. Estimation of contribution of changes in classic risk factors to trends in coronary-event rates across the WHO MONICA project populations. Lancet 2000; 355:675-87.
7. Jenkins CD. Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:324-32.
8. Magnus P, Beaglehole R. The real contribution of the major risk factors to the coronary epidemics. Time to end the 'only-50%' myth. Arch Int Med 2001;161:2657-60.
9. Schwarzer R, Leppin A. Social support and health: a theoretical and empirical overview. J Soc Personal Relations 1991;8:99-127.
10. Greenwood DC, Muir KR, Packham CJ, Madeley RJ. Coronary heart disease: a review of the role of psychosocial stress and social support. J Public Health Med 1996;18:221-31.
11. Eriksen W. The role of social support in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease. A literature review. Family Process 1994;11:201-09.
12. Berkman LF. The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosom Med 1995;57:245-54.
13. Hemingway H, Marmot M. Psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ 1999;318:1460-67.
14. Friedman M, Rosenman RH. Type A Behavior and Your Heart. New York: Knopf, 1974.
15. Matthews KA, Haynes SG. Type A behavior pattern and coronary disease risk. Am J Epidemiol 1986;123:923-60.
16. Booth-Kewley S, Friedman HS. Psychological predictors of heart disease: a quantitative review. Psychol Bull 1987;101:343-62.
17. Miller TQ, Turner CW, Tindale RS, Posavac EJ, Dugoni BL. Reasons for the trend toward null findings in research on Type A behavior. Psychol Bull 1991;110:469-85.
18. Siegman AW. From Type A to hostility to anger: Reflections on the history of coronary prone behavior. In: Siegman AW, Smith TW (eds). Anger, Hostility and the Heart. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994.
19. Scheier MF, Bridges MW. Person variables and health: personality predispositions and acute psychological states as shared determinants for disease. Psychosom Med 1995;57:255-68.
20. Smith TW. Hostility and health: current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychol 1992; 11:139-50.
21. Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, Guijarro ML, Hallet AJ. A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychol Bull 1996;119:322-48.
22. Barefoot JC, Schroll M. Symptoms of depression, acute myocardial infarction, and total mortality in a community sample. Circulation 1996;93:1976-80.
23. Pratt LA, Ford DE, Crum RM, Armenian HK, Gallo JJ, Eaton WW. Depression, psychotropic medication, and risk of myocardial infarction-prospective data from the Baltimore ECA follow-up. Circulation 1996;94:123-29.
24. Hippisley-Cox J, Fielding K, Pringle M. Depression as a risk factor for ischaemic heart disease in men: population based case-control study. BMJ 1998;316:1714-19.
25. Wulsin LR, Vaillant GE, Wells VE. A systematic review of the mortality of depression. Psychosom Med 1999;61:6-17.
26. Glassman AH, Shapiro PA. Depression and the course of coronary artery disease. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:4-11.
27. Barrick CB. Sad, glad, or mad hearts? Epidemiological evidence for a causal relationship between mood disorders and coronary artery disease. J Affective Disord 1999;53:193-201.
28. Haynes SG, Levine S, Scotch N, Feinleib M, Kannel WB. The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study 1. Methods and risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 107:362-83.
29. Haynes SG, Feinleib M, Kannel WB. The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study: III Eight-year incidence of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol 1980;111: 37-58.
30. Haynes SG, Feinleib M. Type A behaviour and the incidence of coronary heart disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Adv Cardiol 1982;29:85-95.
31. Eaker ED, Castelli WP. Type A behavior and coronary heart disease in women: fourteen-year incidence from the Framingham study. In: Houston BK, Snyder CR (eds). Type A Behavior Pattern: Research, Theory, and Intervention. New York: Wiley, 1988, pp. 83-97.
32. Eaker ED, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Frequency of uncomplicated angina pectoris in Type A compared with Type B persons (the Framingham study). Am J Cardiol 1989;63:1042-45.
33. Chesney MA, Black GW, Chadwick JH, Rosenman RH. Psychological correlates of the Type A behaviour pattern. J Behav Med 1981;4:217-29.
34. Sykes DH, Haertel U, Gostautas A, Evans AE. The Framingham type A behaviour pattern and coronary heart disease in three countries: a cross-cultural comparison. Int J Epidemiol 1992;21:1081-89.
35. Cook WW, Medley DM. Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. J Applied Psychol 1954;38:414-18.
36. Greenglass ER, Julkunen J. Construct validity and sex differences in Cook-Medley Hostility. Person Individ Differ 1989;10:209-18.
37. Rodda BE, Miller MC, Bruhn JG. Prediction of anxiety and depression patterns among coronary patients using a Markov process analysis. Behav Sci 1971;16:482-89.
38. World Health Organization. MONICA Psychosocial Optional Study. Suggested Measurement Instruments. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1989.
39. Joreskog K, Sorbom D. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: SSI Scientific Software, 1996.
40. Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 1988;103:391-410.
41. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds). Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993, pp.136-62.
42. SPSS. Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS, 1990.
43. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.
44. Law M, Wald N. Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the time lag explanation. BMJ 1999;318:1471-76.
45. Barefoot JC, Dodge KA, Peterson BL, Dahlstrom WG, Williams RB. The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosom Med 1996;51:46-57.
46. Everson SA, Kauhanen J, Kaplan GA et al. Hostility and increased risk of mortality and acute myocardial infarction: the mediating role of behavioral factors. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:142-52.
47. Price VA. Type A Behavior Pattern: A Model for Research and Practice. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
48. Houston BK, Vavak CR. Cynical hostility: developmental factors, psychosocial correlates, and health behaviors. Health Psychol 1991;10:9-17.
49. Friedman HS, Tucker JS, Reise SP. Personality dimensions and measures potentially relevant to health: a focus on hostility. Ann Behav Med 1995;17:245-53.
50. MacLeod J, Davey Smith G, Heslop P, Metcalfe C, Carroll D, Hart C. Psychological stress and cardiovascular disease: empirical demonstration of bias in a prospective observational study of Scottish men. BMJ 2002;324:1247-53.
51. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: is the bark worse than the bite? J Personality 1987;55:299-316.
52. Evans AE, Ruidavets JB, McCrum EE et al. Autres pays, autres coeurs? Dietary patterns, risk factors and ischaemic heast disease in Belfast and Toulouse. Quart J Med 1995;88:469-77.