PRIMAmob-UML: A methodology for performance analysis of mobile software architectures

Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP2002)

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 262-274

  Grassi, Vincenzo ^a   Mirandola, Raffaela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Architecture modelling; Distributed systems; Mobile components; Performance analysis; UML

Indexed keywords

CLIENT SERVER COMPUTER SYSTEMS; GRAPH THEORY; MOBILE COMPUTING; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PERFORMANCE; QUEUEING NETWORKS;

MOBILE SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0036995017     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. WOSP2000, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Software and Performance. ACM, 2000.
2. M. S. A. Puliafito, S. Riccobene. An analytical comparison of the client-server, remote evaluation and mobile agent paradigms. In 1st Int. Symp. on Agent Systems and Applications and 3rd Int. Symp. on Mobile Agents (ASA/MA 99), October 1999.
3. M. Baldi and G. Picco. Evaluating the tradeoffs of mobile code design paradigms in network management applications. In ICSE 98 Conference Proceedings. IEEE, April 1998.
4. S. Balsamo, P. Inverardi, and C. Mangano. An approach to performance evaluation of software architectures. In WOSP98 Conference Proceedings. ACM, September 1998.
5. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software Architectures in Practice. Addison Wesley, New York, 1998.
6. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison Wesley, New York, 1999.
7. V. Cortellessa and V. Grassi. Performance evaluation of mobility-based software architectures. In WOSP2000 Conference Proceedings. ACM, September 2000.
8. V. Cortellessa, G. Iazeolla, and R. Mirandola. Early performance verification for object-oriented software systems. IEE Proceedings on Software, June 2000.
9. V. Cortellessa and R. Mirandola. Deriving a queueing network based performance model from uml diagrams. In WOSP2000 Conference Proceedings. ACM, September 2000.
10. V. Cortellessa and R. Mirandola. Prima-uml: a performance validation incremental methodology on early uml diagrams. Science of Computer Programming, Elsevier Science, To appear 2002.
11. A. Fuggetta, G. Picco, and G. Vigna. Understanding code mobility. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 24(5):342-361, May 1998.
12. R. Gordon, P. Loewner, and E. MacNair. The research queueing package version 3. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, New York, 1992.
13. V. Grassi and R. Mirandola. Modeling and performance analysis of mobile software architectures in a uml framework. In UML2001 Conference Proceedings. LNCS 2185, Springer Verlag, October 2001.
14. R. Jain. Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. Wiley, New York, 1990.
15. P. Kahkipuro. Uml based performance modeling framework for object-oriented distributed systems. In UML1999 Conference Proceedings. LNCS 1723, Springer Verlag, October 1999.
16. P. King and R. Pooley. Using uml to derive stochastic petri net models. In Proc. of the 15th UK Performance Engineering Workshop. Dept. of Computer Science, The University of Bristol, July 1999.
17. D. Kotz, G. Jiang, R. Gray, G. Cybenko, and R. Peterson. Performance analysis of mobile agents for filtering data streams on wireless networks. In 3rd Int. Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems. ACM, August 2000.
18. S. Lavenberg. Computer Performance Modeling Handbook. Academic Press, New York, 1983.
19. J. Merseguer, J. Campos, and E. Mena. Performance evaluation for the design of agent-based systems: A petri net approach. In Proc. of Software Engineering and Petri Nets (SEPN 2000), June 2000.
20. R. Mirandola and V. Cortellessa. Uml based performance modeling of distributed systems. In UML2000 Conference Proceedings. LNCS 1939, Springer Verlag, October 2000.
21. D. Petriu, C. Shousha, and A. Jalnapurkar. Architecture based performance analysis applied to a telecommunication system. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, November 2000.
22. R. Pooley and P. King. The unified modeling language and performance engineering. IEE Proceedings on Software, 146(1):2-10, February 1999.
23. G. Roman, G. Picco, and A. Murphy. Software enginering for mobility: a roadmap. In The future of SW engineering (A. Finkelstein ed.). ACM Press, 2000.
24. O. Samaras, M. Dikaiakos, C. Spyrou, and A. Liverdos. Mobile agent platforms for web databases: a qualitative and quantitative assessment. In 1st Int. Symp. on Agent Systems and Applications and 3rd Int. Symp. on Mobile Agents (ASA/MA 99), October 1999.
25. B. Selic. Response to the omg rfp for schedulability, performance and time. In OMG document number ad/2001-06-14, June 2001.
26. C. Smith. Performance Engineering of Software Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.
27. T. Spalink, J. Hartman, and G. Gibson. The effects of a mobile agent on file service. In 1st Int. Symp. on Agent Systems and Applications and 3rd Int. Symp. on Mobile Agents (ASA/MA 99), October 1999.
28. B. Spitznagel and D. Garlan. Architecture-based performance analysis. In Proc. 1998 Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, June 1998.
29. M. Strasser and M. Schwehm. A performance model for mobile agent system. In Int. Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA 97), 1997.
30. L. Williams and C. Smith. Performance evaluation of software architecture. In Wosp 1998 Conference Proceedings. ACM, September 1998.