The impact of negative campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 senatorial primaries

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 845-860

  Djupe, Paul A ^b   Peterson, David A M ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036993949     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290205500406     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abramowitz, Alan I., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Ansolabehere, Steven, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative. New York: Free Press.
3. Ansolabehere, Steven, Shanto Iyengar, Adam Simon, and Nicholas Valentino. 1994. "Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?" American Political Science Review 88: 829-38.
4. Ansolabehere, Steven, Shanto Iyengar, and Adam Simon. 1999. "Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: "The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout." American Political Science Review 93: 901-10.
5. Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 1998. "Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes: Another Look at Presidential Campaigns." American Journal of Political Science 42: 256-71.
6. Bernstein, Robert A. 1977. "Divisive Primaries do Hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956-1972." American Political Science Review 71: 540-47.
7. Buell, Emmett H., Jr. 1986. "Divisive Primaries and Participation in the Fall Presidential Campaigns: A Study of 1984 New Hampshire Primary Activists." American Politics Quarterly 14: 376-90.
8. Dalton, Russell J., Paul A. Beck, and Robert Huckfeldt. 1998. "Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election." American Political Science Review 92: 111-26.
9. Hacker, Andrew. 1965. "Does a 'Divisive' Primary Harm a Candidate's Election Chances?" American Political Science Review 59: 105-10.
10. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Johnson, Donald B. and James R. Gibson. 1974. "Divisive Primary Revisited: Activists in Iowa." American Political Science Review 68: 67-77.
12. Kenney, Patrick J., and Tom W. Rice. 1987. "The Relationship between Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes." American Journal of Political Science 31: 31-44.
13. Key, V. O., Jr. 1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York: Knopf.
14. Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. "The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data." Biometrics 33:159-74.
15. Lau, Richard R., and Gerald Pomper. 1998. "Accentuating the Negative?: Effects of Negative Campaigning in US Senate Elections." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
16. Lengle, James I., Diana Owen, and Molly Sonner. 1995. "Divisive Nominating Mechanisms and Democratic Party Electoral Prospects." Journal of Politics 57: 370-83.
17. Mayer, William G. 1996a. The Divided Democrats: Ideological Unity, Party Reform, and Presidential Elections. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18. _. 1996b. "In Defense of Negative Campaigning." Political Science Quarterly 111: 437-55.
19. Miller, Penny M., Malcolm E. Jewell, and Lee Sigelman. 1988. "Divisive Primaries and Party Activists: Kentucky, 1979 and 1983." Journal of Politics 50: 459-70.
20. West, Darrell M. 1994. "Political Advertising and News Coverage in the 1992 California U.S. Senate Campaigns." Journal of Politics 56: 1053-75.
21. _. 1997. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns: 1952-1996, 2nd ed. Washington DC: CQ Press.