Why watermark? The copyright need for an engineering solution

Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 324-325

  Seadle, Michael ^a   Deller Jr , J R ^b   Gurijala, Aparna ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Copyright; DMCA; Watermarking

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COPYRIGHTS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; STEREOPHONIC RECORDINGS;

AUDIO WATERMARKING; COPYRIGHT PROTECTION; PROTECTION MECHANISM; WATERMARKING TECHNOLOGIES;

DIGITAL WATERMARKING;

EID: 0036992790     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Deller, J.R. Jr., Gurijala, A, and Seadle, M. Audio Watermaking Techniques for the National Gallery of the Spoken Word. Proceedings of JCDL 2001 (Roanoke VA, June 2001), ACM Press, 237-238.
2. United States Code, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 102.
3. Leach, E.D. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Digital Performance Rights.... J of the Copyright Society of the USA, 84 (1-2, Fall-Winter 2000), 191-291
4. Nimmer, M., Marcus, P., Myers, D., Nimmer, D. Cases and Materials on Copyright. 4th edition, West Publishing, St. Paul, MN. (1991), 165 ff.
5. Estate of Martin Luther King v. CBS, 98-9079 (5 Nov 1999), 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
6. United States Code, Title 17, Chapter 1, section 105.
7. Simons, B. Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies. (Feb. 17, 2000) http://www.acm.org/usacm/IP/dmca/exemption.htm.
8. US Copyright Office. Study Required by Section 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. (12 Sept 2001) http://www.loc.gov/copyright/reports/studies/dmca/.
9. Isenberg, D. The DMCA's Controversial Criminal Anti-Circumvention Provisions. (Oct 2001) GigaLaw.com
10. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 99-5183 (10 Aug 2000), N. District Court of California.