The relationship between ASK and relevance criteria

SIGIR Forum (ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval)

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 359-360

  Yuan, Xiao Jun ^a   Belkin, Nicholas J ^a   Kim, Ja Young ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anomalous state of knowledge; Relevance criteria; Relevance judgments

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); EXPERT SYSTEMS; GRAPH THEORY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; STATISTICAL TESTS;

ANOMALOUS STATE OF KNOWLEDGE; CONTENT ANALYTIC CODING; HUMAN RELEVANCE JUDGEMENT BEHAVIOUR; RELEVANCE CRITERIA;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0036992372     PISSN: 01635840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/564376.564443     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Barry, C. & Schamber, L. 1998 Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Information Processing and Management, 34 (2/3), 219-236.
2. Bateman, J. (1999). Modeling the importance of end-user relevance criteria. Proceedings of the 62nd ASIS Annual Meeting, 36, 396-406.
3. Belkin, N.J. (1980) Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
4. Belkin, N.J. & Kwasnik, B. (1986) Using structural representations of anomalous states of knowledge for choosing document retrieval strategies. Proceedings of 1986 ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Pisa, Italy, 11-22
5. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N., & Brooks, H.M. (1982) ASK for information retrieval, Part II. Results of a design study. Journal of Documentation, 38 (2), 145-167.
6. Cool, C., Belkin, N.J., Frieder, O. & Kantor, P. Characteristics of texts affecting relevance judgments. (1993) In M.E. Williams, ed. Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Online Meeting, Medford, NJ, Learned Information, Inc: 77-83
7. Hapeshi, K. & Belkin, N. J. (1985) Developing and evaluating a automatic on-line information retrieval system based on user problem statements. Proceedings of RIAO '85, Grenoble, France, I.M.A.G., 681-698.
8. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M, & Nilan M. 1990 A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing and Management, 26, 775-776.
9. Schamber, L. & Bateman, J. (1996). User criteria in relevance evaluation: Toward development of a measurement scale. Proceedings of the 59th ASIS Annual Meeting, 33, 218-225.
10. Spink, A. & Saracevic, T. (1997) Interactive information retrieval: Sources and effectiveness of search terms during mediated online searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 741-761