Two approaches to integrating UML and performance models

Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP2002)

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 91-92

  Hopkins, R P ^a   Smith, M J ^a   King, P J B ^a   Pooley, R J ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PERFORMANCE; PETRI NETS; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING;

SOFTWARE SPECIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0036989045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. R. P. Hopkins and P. J. King. A visual formalism for the composition of stochastic Petri nets. In T. Field, P. Harrison, J. Bradley, and U. Harder, editors, Tools 2002, number 2324 in LNCS, pages 239-258. Springer, 2002.
2. P. Kähkipuro. UML-based performance modeling framework for component-based distributed systems. In R. Dumke, C. Rautenstrauch, A. Schmietendorf, and A. Scholz, editors, Performance Engineering: State of the Art and Current Trends, number 2047 in LNCS, pages 167-184. Springer, 2001.
3. UML profile for schedulability, performance and time specification, 2002. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2002-03-02.
4. R. Pooley and P. King. The Unified Modeling Language and performance engineering. IEE Proceedings on Software Engineering, 146(1):2-10, Feb. 1999.
5. B. Selic. The emerging real-time standard. In Sixth International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, pages 3-9, 2001.
6. C. U. Smith. Performance Engineering of Software Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1990.