|
Volumn 96 Suppl 2, Issue , 2002, Pages
|
Cost-effectiveness of the use of vector control and mass drug administration, separately or in combination, against lymphatic filariasis.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIFILARIAL AGENT;
DIETHYLCARBAMAZINE;
IVERMECTIN;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
CULEX;
DISEASE CARRIER;
DISEASE TRANSMISSION;
DRUG COMBINATION;
ECONOMICS;
ELEPHANTIASIS;
ENDEMIC DISEASE;
HEALTH;
HUMAN;
INDIA;
METHODOLOGY;
MOSQUITO;
PARASITOLOGY;
WUCHERERIA BANCROFTI;
ANIMALS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
CULEX;
DIETHYLCARBAMAZINE;
DISEASE VECTORS;
DRUG THERAPY, COMBINATION;
ELEPHANTIASIS, FILARIAL;
ENDEMIC DISEASES;
FILARICIDES;
HUMANS;
INDIA;
IVERMECTIN;
MOSQUITO CONTROL;
RURAL HEALTH;
WUCHERERIA BANCROFTI;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 0036987479
PISSN: 00034983
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1179/000349802125002428 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (0)
|