Individual differences in faking integrity tests

Psychological Reports

Volumn 91, Issue 3 PART 1, 2002, Pages 691-702

  Brown, Reagan D ^a   Cothern, Christopher M ^b  

^a WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Baltimore County ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; PERSONALITY TEST; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; RECUMBENCY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; STUDENT; THEFT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PERSONNEL LOYALTY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS; THEFT;

EID: 0036984661     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.3.691     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ALLIGER, G. M., & DWIGHT, S. A. (2000) A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59-72.
2. ALLIGER, G. M., LILIENFELD, S. O., & MITCHELL, K. E. (1996) The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7, 32-39.
3. ARTHUR, W., &DAY, D. V. (1994) Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 394-403.
4. ASH, P. (1971) Screening employment applicants for attitudes toward theft. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 161-164.
5. BARRICK, M., & MOUNT, M. (1996) Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 261-272.
6. BROOKS, P. B., & ARNOLD, D. A. (1989) Reid Report examiner's manual. (3rd ed.) Chicago, IL: Reid Psychological Systems.
7. CROCKER, L., & ALGINA, J. (1986) Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. CUNNIKGHAM, M. R., WONG, D. T., & BARBEE, A. P. (1994) Self-presentation dynamics on overt integrity tests: experimental studies of the Reid Report. Journal of Applied Psychology, 789, 643-658.
9. GRAHAM, J. R., WATTS, D., & TIMBROOK, R. E. (1991) Detecting fake-good and fake-bad MMPI-2 profiles. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 264-277.
10. HAUENSTEIN, N. M. (1998) Faking personality and selection: does it matter? Paper presented at the 13th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
11. HERRNSTEIN, R. J., & MURRAY, C. (199-4) The bell curve: intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
12. HOGAN, J., & BRINKMEYER, K. (1997) Bridging the gap between overt and personality-based integrity tests. Personnel Psychology, 50, 587-600.
13. HOGAN, R., HOGAN, J., & ROBERTS, B. W. (1996) Personality measurement and employment decisions: questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469-477.
14. HOUGH, L., EATON, N., DUNNETTE, M., KAMP, J., & McCLOY, R. (1990) Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion of those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
15. HUFFCUT, A. I., & ARTHUR, W. (1994) Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184-190.
16. JENSEN, A. R. (1969) How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.
17. JENSEN, A. R. (1985) The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193-263.
18. LoBELLO, S. G., &SIMS, B. N. (1993) Fakability of a commercially produced pre-employment integrity test. Journal of Business and Psychology, 8, 265-273.
19. MCCRAE, R. R., & COSTA, P. T., JR. (1983) Social desirability: more substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.
20. MCFARLAND, L. A., & RYAN, A. M. (2000) Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.
21. ONES, D. S., & VISWESVARAN, C. (1998) The effects of social desirability and faking on personality and integrity assessment for personnel selection. Human Performance, 11, 245-269.
22. ONES, D. S., VISWESVARAN, C., & SCHMIDT, F. L. (1993) Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703. [Monograph]
23. PAUL, S. M. (1985) The Advanced Raven's Progressive Matrices: normative data for an American university population and an examination of the relationship with Spearman's g. Journal of Experimental Education, 54, 95-100.
24. PAULHUS, D. L. (1984) Two-component model of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
25. PEDHAZUR, E. J., & SCHMELKIN, L. P. (1991) Measurement, design, and analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. RAVEN, J. C., COURT, J. H., & RAVEN, J. (1993) Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary scales, Section 4: Advanced Progressive Matrices, Sets H and I. London: H. K. Lewis.
27. REID PSYCHOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. (1992) The Abbreviated Reid Report. (28th ed.) Chicago, IL: Author.
28. ROSSE, J. G., STECHLER, M. D., MILLER, J. L., & LEVIN, R. A. (1998) The impact of response distortion on pre-employment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634-644.
29. SPEARMAN, C., & JONES, L. L. (1950) Human ability. New York: Macmillan.
30. WOOLLEY, R. M., & HAKSTIAN, A. R. (1992) An examination of the construct validity of personality-based and overt measures of integrity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 475-489.