![]() |
Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 361-408
|
Informed consent and the elusive dichotomy between standard and experimental therapy
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BIOMEDICINE;
EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY;
EXPERIMENTATION;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LAW;
LICENSING;
MALPRACTICE;
MEDICAL CARE;
MEDICAL PRACTICE;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
PATIENT AUTONOMY;
PATIENT SAFETY;
PHYSICIAN;
REVIEW;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AGENCIES;
|
EID: 0036984101
PISSN: 00988588
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1017/s0098858800002690 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (49)
|
References (0)
|