Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 283-299

  Cho, Raymond Y ^a,b,d   Nystrom, Leigh E ^a   Brown, Eric T ^a   Jones, Andrew D ^c   Braver, Todd S ^c   Holmes, Philip J ^a   Cohen, Jonathan D ^a,b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COLLEGE STUDENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIMATE; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036982568     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.2.4.283     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. AUDLEY, R. J. (1973). Some observations on theories of choice reaction time: Tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 509-549). New York: Academic Press.
2. BERNS, G., COHEN, J., & MINTUN, M. (1997). Brain regions responsive to novelty in the absence of awareness. Science, 276, 1272-1275.
3. BERTELSON, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90-102.
4. BOTVINICK, M. M., BRAVER, T. S., BARCH, D. M., CARTER, C. S., & COHEN, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
5. BROWN, E., & HOLMES, P. (2001). Modeling a simple choice task: Stochastic dynamics of inhibitory neural groups. Stochastics & Dynamics, 1, 159-191.
6. CARTER, C. S., BRAVER, T. S., BARCH, D. M., BOTVINICK, M. M., NOLL, D., & COHEN, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
7. CLEEREMANS, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. COHEN, J. D., DUNBAR, K., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
9. COHEN, J. D., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
10. DONCHIN, E., & COLES, M. G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 357-427.
11. DORRIS, M. C., & MUNOZ, D. P. (1998). Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7015-7026.
12. DORRIS, M. C., PARE, M., & MUNOZ, D. P. (2000). Immediate neural plasticity shapes motor performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1-5.
13. DORRIS, M. C., TAYLOR, T. L., & KLEIN, R. M. (1999). Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 2429-2436.
14. FALMAGNE, J. C., COHEN, S. P., & DWIVEDI, A. (1975). Two-choice reactions as an ordered memory scanning process. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 296-344). New York: Academic Press.
15. HINTON, G. E., & PLAUT, D. C. (1987). Using fast weights to deblur old memories. In Program of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 177-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. HUETTEL, S. A., MACK, P. B., & MCCARTHY, G. (2002). Perceiving patterns in random series: Dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 485-490.
17. HYMAN, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188-196.
18. JONES, A. D., CHO, R. Y., NYSTROM, L. E., COHEN, J. D., & BRAVER, T. S. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 300-317.
19. KIRBY, N. H. (1976). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 567-577.
20. KIRBY, N. H. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129-172). London: Academic Press.
21. KORNBLUM, S. (1967). Choice reaction times for repetitions and nonrepetitions: A re-examination of the information hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 27, 178-187.
22. LAMING, D. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. London: Academic Press.
23. LAMING, D. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199-224.
24. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
26. MOZER, M. C., COLAGROSSO, M. D., & HUBER, D. H. (2002). A rational analysis of cognitive control in a speeded discrimination task. In T. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems XIV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. POSNER, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. RABBITT, P., & RODGERS, B. (1977). What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 727-743.
29. RATCLIFF, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-10.
30. RATCLIFF, R., VAN ZANDT, T., & MCKOON, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
31. REMINGTON, R. J. (1968). Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 250-257.
32. SOETENS, E., BOER, L. C., & HUETING, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 598-616.
33. SOMMER, W., LEUTHOLD, H., & SOETENS, E. (1999). Covert signs of expectancy in serial reaction time tasks revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 342-353.
34. SQUIRES, K. C., WICKENS, C., SQUIRES, N. K., & DONCHIN, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142-1146.
35. STERNBERG, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-457.
36. STROGATZ, S. (1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Reading, MA: Perseus.
37. USHER, M., & MCCLELLAND, J. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.
38. VERVAECK, K. R., & BOER, L. C. (1980). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Subjective expectancy and automatic aftereffect at short response-stimulus intervals. Acta Psychologica, 44, 175-190.
39. YEUNG, N., BOTVINICK, M. M., & COHEN, J. D. (2002). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Manuscript submitted for publication.