Evidence for spatio-temporal selectivity in attentional modulation of the motion aftereffect

Spatial Vision

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 21-31

  Georgiades, M S ^a   Harris, J P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Motion aftereffect; Spatial frequency; Temporal frequency

Indexed keywords

ATTENUATION; FREQUENCIES; GRAPH THEORY; MOTION ESTIMATION;

SPATIAL FREQUENCIES;

VISION;

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0036981340     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/15685680260433887     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Ashida, H. and Susami, K. (1997). Linear motion aftereffect induced by pure relative motion, Perception 26, 7-16.
2. Bex, P. J., Verstraten, F. A. J. and Mareschal, I. (1996). Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect, Vision Research 36, 2721-2727.
3. Braddick, O. J., Campbell, F. W. and Atkinson, J. (1987). Channels in vision: Basic aspects, in: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz and H.-L. Teuber (Eds), Vol. VIII, pp. 3-38. Springer Verlag, Heidelber.
4. Cameron, E. L., Baker, C. L. and Boukon, J. C. (1992). Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect, Vision Research 32, 561-568.
5. Carpenter, R. H. S. (1988). Movements of the Eyes, 2nd edn. Pion, London.
6. Chaudhuri, A. (1990). Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention, Nature (London) 344, 60-62.
7. Cleary, R. and Braddick, O. J. (1990). Masking of low frequency information in short-range apparent motion, Vision Research 30, 317-327.
8. Culham, J. C, Verstraten, F. A. J., Ashida, H. and Cavanagh, P. (2000). Independent aftereffects of attention and motion, Neuron 28, 607-615.
9. Dichgans, J. (1977). Optokinetic nystagmus as dependent on the retinal periphery via the vestibular nucleus, in: Control of Gaze by Brainstem Neurosis, R. Baker and A. Berthoz (Eds), pp. 261-267. Elsevier/North Holland Press, Amsterdam.
10. Dick, M. (1989). Parallel and serial processes in motion detection, PhD thesis, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel.
11. Georgiades, M. S. and Harris, J. P. (2000a). The spatial spread of attentional modulation of the motion aftereffect, Perception 29, 1185-1201.
12. Georgiades, M. S. and Harris, J. P. (2000b). Attentional diversion during adaptation affects the velocity as well as the duration of motion aftereffects, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B 267, 2559-2565.
13. Graham, N. V. S. (1989). Visual Pattern Analysers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Johnston, A. and Wright, M. J. (1983). Visual motion and cortical velocity, Nature (London) 304, 436-438.
15. Kinchla, R. A. and Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: 'Top-down', 'bottom-up', or 'middle-out', Perception and Psychophysics 25, 225-231.
16. Kulikowski, J. J. and Tolhurst, D. J. (1973). Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision, J. Physiol. (London) 232, 149-162.
17. Lankheet, M. J. M. and Verstraten, F. A. J. (1995). Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion, Vision Research 35, 1401-1412.
18. Mandler, M. B. and Makous, W. (1984). A three channel model of temporal frequency perception, Vision Research 24, 1881-1887.
19. Moulden, B. P. (1974). Aftereffects, or a treatise on the consequences of adaptation to tilt and motion, PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.
20. Murakami, I. and Shimojo. S. (1995). Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on stimulus size and eccentricity, Vision Research 35, 1835-1844.
21. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception, Cognitive Psychology 9, 353-383.
22. Pantle, A. (1974). Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analysers, Vision Research 14, 1229-1236.
23. Rees, G., Frith, C. D. and Lavie, N. (1997). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task, Science 278, 1616-1619.
24. Schor, C. and Narayan, V. (1981). The influence of field size upon the spatial frequency response of optokinetic nystagmus, Vision Research 21, 985-994.
25. Snowden, R. J. and Milne, A. B. (1996). The effects of adapting to complex motions: position invariance and tuning to spiral motions, J. Cognitive Neurosci. 8, 435-452.
26. Snowden, R. J. and Milne, A. B. (1997). Phantom motion aftereffects - evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow, Current Biology 7, 717-722.
27. Thompson, P. G. (1983). Discrimination of moving gratings at and above detection thresholds, Vision Research 23, 1533-1538.
28. Thompson, P. G. (1998). Tuning of the motion aftereffect, in: The Motion Aftereffect: A Modern Perspective, Mather, G., Verstraten, F. and Anstis, S. (Eds), pp. 41-55. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
29. Watt, R. J. (1987). Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 4, 2006-2021.
30. Wilson, H. R. and Bergen, J. R. (1979). A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision, Vision Research 19, 19-32.
31. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1, 202-238.
32. Wright, M. J. and Johnston, A. (1985). Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect, Vision Research 25, 1947-1955.
33. Yeshurun, Y. and Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution, Nature (London) 396, 72-75.