Constrained latent class analysis of three-way three-mode data

Journal of Classification

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 277-302

  Meulders, Michel ^a   De Boeck, Paul ^a   Kuppens, Peter ^a   Van Mechelen, Iven ^a  

^a Department of Psychology ^*

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Constrained latent class analysis; Three way data

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036978369     PISSN: 01764268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00357-001-0046-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory, pp. 271-281. Budapest: Academiai Kiado.
2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
3. Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
4. Cowles, K., & Carlin, B. P. (1996). Markov Chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 883-904.
5. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38.
6. Efron, B, & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapmann & Hall.
7. Hunt, L. A., & Basford, K. E. (1999). Fitting a mixture model to three-mode three-way data with categorical and continuous variables. Journal of Classification, 16, 283-296.
8. Fischer, G. H. (1983). Logistic latent trait models with linear constraints. Psychometrika, 48, 3-26.
9. Formann, A. K. (1985). Constrained latent class models: Theory and applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 87-111.
10. Formann, A. K. (1989). Constrained latent class models: Some further applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 37-54.
11. Formann, A. K. (1992). Linear logistic latent class analysis for polytomous data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 476-486.
12. Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398-409.
13. Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457-472.
14. Gelman, A., Meng, X. M., & Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica, 4, 733-807.
15. Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721-741.
16. Goodman, L. A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215-231.
17. Leenen, I., Van Mechelen, I., De Boeck, P., & Rosenberg, S. (1999). INDCLAS: A three-way hierarchical classes model. Psychometrika, 64, 9-24.
18. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2001). Latent class factor and cluster models, biplots, and related graphical displays. Sociological methodology, 31, 223-264.
19. Maris, E. (1999), Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64, 187-212.
20. Maris, E., De Boeck, P., & Van Mechelen, I. (1996). Probability matrix decomposition models. Psychometrika, 61, 7-29.
21. Meulders, M., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Gelman, A. (2000) Hierarchical extensions of probability matrix decomposition models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Meulders, M, De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I. (2001). Probability matrix decomposition models and main-effects generalized linear models for the analysis of replicated binary associations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 38, 217-233.
23. Meulders, M., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I., Gelman, A., & Maris, E. (2001). Bayesian inference with probability matrix decomposition models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 153-179.
24. Meulders, M., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I. (2002). A taxonomy of latent structure assumptions for probability matrix decomposition models. Accepted by Psychometrika.
25. Myung, J. (2000). The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190-204.
26. Raftery, A. E. (1986). A note on Bayes factors for log-linear contingency table models with vague prior information. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 48, 249-250.
27. Reiser, M., & Lin, Y. (1999). A goodness-of-fit test for the latent class model when expected frequencies are small. Sociological Methodology, 29, 81-111.
28. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
29. Tanner, M. A., & Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528-540.
30. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in femles: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411-429.
31. Vermunt, J. K. (1997a). LEM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. User's manual. Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
32. Vermunt J. K. (1997b). Log-linear models for event histories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2000). Latent GOLD 2.0 user's guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.