Nulling the motion aftereffect with dynamic random-dot stimuli: Limitations and implications

Journal of Vision

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 302-311

  Castet, Eric ^a   Keeble, David R T ^b   Verstraten, Frans A J ^c  

^a Ctr Rech en Neurosci Cognitives   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aliasing; Density; Eccentricity; Integration; Motion adaptation; Segregation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PREDICTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; AFTERIMAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; AFTERIMAGE; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0036977177     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/2.4.3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson, S. J., & Burr, D. C. (1985). Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system. Vision Research, 25, 1147-1154.
2. Anstis, S. M. (1986). Motion perception in the frontal plane: Sensory aspects. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1-27). New York: Wiley.
3. Ashida, H., & Osaka, N. (1995). Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity. Vision Research, 35, 1825-1833.
4. Barlow, H., & Tripathy, S. P. (1997). Correspondence noise and signal pooling in the detection of coherent visual motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7954-7966.
5. Blake, R., & Hiris, E. (1993). Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 33, 1589-1592.
6. Hiris, E., & Blake, R. (1992). Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 9025-9028.
7. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467-477.
8. Mather, G., Verstraten, F. A. J., & Anstis, S. (Eds.) (1998). The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Mestre, D. R., Masson, G. S., & Stone, L. S. (2001). Spatial scale of motion segmentation from speed cues. Vision Research, 41, 2697-2713.
10. Morgan, M. J. (1979). Perception of continuity in stroboscopic motion: A temporal frequency analysis. Vision Research, 19, 491-500.
11. Newsome, W. T., Britten, K. H., & Movshon, J. A. (1989). Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision. Nature, 341, 52-54.
12. Newsome, W. T., & Paré, E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2201-2211.
13. Nishida, S., & Sato, T. (1995). Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Research, 35, 477-490.
14. Pantle, A. (1998). How do measures of the motion aftereffect measure up? In G. Mather, F. A. J. Verstraten, & S. Anstis (Eds.), The motion aftereffect: A modern perspective (pp. 25-39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Qian, N., Andersen, R. A., & Adelson, E. H. (1994). Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 7357-7366.
16. van de Grind, W. A., Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1986). The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field. Vision Research, 26, 797-810.
17. van de Grind, W. A., van Doorn, A. J., & Koenderink, J. J. (1983). Detection of coherent movement in peripherally viewed random-dot patterns. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 73, 1674-1683.
18. van de Grind, W. A., van Hof, P., van der Smagt, M. J., & Verstraten, F. A. (2001). Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 437-443.
19. van de Grind, W. A., Verstraten, F. A. J., & Zwamborn, K. M. (1994). Ensemble models of the movement aftereffect and the influence of eccentricity. Perception, 23, 1171-1179.
20. van der Smagt, M. J., Verstraten, F. A. J., & van de Grind, W. A. (1999). A new transparent motion aftereffect. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 595-596.
21. Verstraten, F. A. J., van der Smagt, M. J., Fredericksen, R. E., & van de Grind, W. A. (1999). Integration after adaptation to transparent motion: Static and dynamic test patterns result in different aftereffect directions. Vision Research, 39, 803-810.
22. Verstraten, F. A. J., van der Smagt, M. J., & van de Grind, W. A. (1998). Aftereffect of high-speed motion. Perception, 27, 1055-1066.
23. Vidnyanszky, Z., Blaser, E., & Papathomas, T. V. (2002). Motion integration during motion aftereffects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 157-161.
24. Watson, A. B., Ahumada, A. J., & Farrell, J. E. (1986). Window of visibility: A psychophysical theory of fidelity in time-sampled visual motion displays. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3, 300-307.