The contributions of the European Cosmetics Industry to the development of alternatives to animal testing: Dialogue with ECVAM and future challenges

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 30, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2002, Pages 189-193

  De Silva, Odile ^a  

^a L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

Author keywords

Alternative methods; COLIPA; Cosmetics testing; Percutaneous absorption; Phototoxicity; Sensitisation; Skin corrosion; Skin tolerance; Validation

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORNEA CELL; EUROPE; EYE IRRITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PHOTOTOXICITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SKIN ABSORPTION; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SKIN TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0036975764     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290203002s29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Lisansky, S., Macmillan, R. & Dupuis, J., eds (1996). Alternatives to Animal Testing. Proceedings of an International Scientific Conference Organised by the European Cosmetics Industry, Brussels, Belgium 1995, 377pp. Newbury, UK: CPL Press.
2. COLIPA (1997). Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products. Brussels, Belgium: COL-IPA.
3. Clark, D., Lisansky, S. & Macmillan, R., eds (1999). Alternatives to Animal Testing II. Proceedings of the Second International Scientific Conference Organised by the European Cosmetics Industry, Brussels, Belgium, 294pp. Newbury, UK: CPL Press.
4. Bagley, D.M., Bruner, L.H., de Silva, O., Cottin, M., O'Brien, K.A.F., Uttley, M. & Walker, A.P. (1992). An evaluation of five potential alternatives in vitro to the rabbit eye irritation test in vivo. Toxicology in Vitro 6, 275-284.
5. Curren, R.D., Southee, J.A., Spielmann, H., Liebsch, M., Fentem, J.H. & Balls, M. (1995). The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternatives methods. ATLA 23, 211-217.
6. Brantom, P.G., Bruner, L.H., Chamberlain, M., de Silva, O., Dupuis, J., Earl, L.K., Lovell, D.P., Pape, W.J.W., Uttley, M., Bagley, D.M., Baker, F.W., Bracher, M., Courtellemont, P., Declercq, L., Freeman, S., Steiling, W., Walker, A.P., Carr, G.J., Dami, M., Thomas, G., Harbell, J., Jones, P.A., Pfannenbecker, U., Southee, J.A., Tcheng, M., Argembeaux, H., Casteli, D., Clothier, R., Esdaile, D.J., Itagaki, H., Junk, K., Kasai, Y., Kojima, H., Kristen, U., Larnicol, M., Lewis, R.W., Marenus, K., Moreno, O., Peterson, A., Rasmussen, E.S., Robles, C. & Stern, M. (1997). A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro 11, 141-179.
7. Bruner, L.H., de Silva, O., Earl, L.K., Pape, W. & Spielmann, H. (1998). Report on the COLIPA workshop on mechanisms of eye irritation. ATLA 26, 811-820.
8. Balls, M., Berg, N., Bruner, L.H., Curren, R.D., de Silva, O., Earl, L.K., Esdaile, D.J., Fentem, J.H., Liebsch, M., Ohno, Y., Prinsen, M.K., Spielmann, H. & Worth, A.P. (1999). The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 34. ATLA 27, 53-77.
9. Spielmann, H., Balls, M., Brand, M., Döring, B., Holzhütter, H-G., Kalweit, S., Klecak, G., Lépannetier, H., Liebsch, M., Lovell, W.W., Maurer, T., Moldenhauer, F., Moore, L., Pape, W.J.W., Pfannenbecker, U. Potthast, J., de Silva, O., Steiling, W. & Willshaw, A. (1994). EC/COLIPA project on in vitro phototoxicity testing: first results obtained with the Balb/c 3T3 cell phototoxicity assay. Toxicology in Vitro 8, 793-796.
10. Spielmann, H., Lovell, W.W., Hölzle, E., Johnson, B.E., Maurer, J., Miranda, M., Pape, W.J.W., Sapora, O. & Sladowski, D. (1994). In vitro phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 2. ATLA 22, 314-348.
11. Spielmann, H., Balls, M., Dupuis, J., Pape, W.J.W., Pechovitch, G., de Silva, O., Holzhfitter, H.G., Clothier, R., Desolle, P., Gerberick, G.F., Liebsch, M., Lovell, W.W., Maurer, T., Pfannenbecker, U., Potthast, J.M., Csato, M., Sladowski, D., Steiling, W. & Brantom, P. (1998). The international EU/COL-IPA in vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of Phase II (blind trial); part I: the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Toxicology in Vitro 12, 305-327.
12. SCCNFP (1998). Opinion on In Vitro Methods to Assess Phototoxicity in the Safety Evaluation of Cosmetic Ingredients or Mixtures of Ingredients. SCCNFP/0069/98. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General.
13. de Silva, O. & Loprieno, N. (2000). Collaboration as the way to the acceptance of alternative methods. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 1665-1672. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
14. Fentem, J.H., Archer, G.F.B., Balls, M., Botham, P.A., Curren, R.D., Earl, L.K., Esdaile, D.J., Holzhütter, H.G. & Liebsch, M. (1998). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. II. Results and evaluation by the Management Team. Toxicology in Vitro 12, 483-524.
15. SCCNFP (1998). Opinion on In Vitro Methods to Assess Skin Corrosivity in the Safety Evaluation of Cosmetic Ingredients or Mixtures of Ingredients. SCCNFP/0070/98. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General.
16. Howes, D., Guy, R., Hadgraft, J., Heylings, J., Hoeck, U., Kemper, F., Maibach, H., Marty, J-P., Merk, H., Parra, J., Rekkas, D., Rondelli, I., Schaefer, H., Täuber, U. & Verbiese, N. (1996). Methods for assessing percutaneous absorption. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 13. ATLA 24, 81-106.
17. COLIPA (1995). Cosmetic Ingredients: Guidelines for Percutaneous Absorption/Penetration. 20pp. Brussels, Belgium: COLIPA.
18. Diembeck, W., Beck, H., Benech-Fieffer, F., Courtellemont, P., Dupuis, J., Lovell, W., Paye, M., Spengler, J. & Steiling, W. (1999). Test Guidelines for in vitro assessment of cosmetic ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology 37, 191-205.
19. SCCNFP (1999). Opinion on In Vitro Methods to Assess Percutaneous Absorption of Cosmetic Ingredients. SCCNFP/0088/98. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General.
20. Rogiers, V., Balls, M., Basketter, D.A., Berardesca, E., Edwards, C., Elsner, P., Ennen, J., Lévêque, J.L., Loden, M., Masson, P., Parra, P., Paye, M., Pierard, G., Rodrigues, L., Schaefer, H., Salter, D. & Zuang, V. (1999). The potential use of non-invasive methods in safety assessment of cosmetics. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 38. ATLA 27, 515-537.
21. Van de Sandt, H., Roguet, R., Cohen, C., Esdaile, D., Ponec, M., Corsini, E., Barker, C., Fusenig, N., Liebsch, M., Benford, D., de Brugerolle de Fraissinett, A. & Fartasch, M. (1999). The use of human keratinocytes and human skin models for predicting skin irritation. ATLA 27, 723-743.
22. Fentem, J.H., Briggs, D., Chesné, C., Elliott, G.R., Harbell, J.W., Keyling, J.R., Portes, P., Roguet, R., Van de Sandt, H. & Botham, P. (2001). A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: results and evaluation by the Management Team. Toxicology in Vitro 15, 57-93.
23. Zuang, V., Balls, M., Botham, P., Coquette, A., Corsini, E., Curren, R.D., Elliott, G.R., Fentem, J.H., Heylings, J.R., Liebsch, M., Medina, J., Roguet, R., Van de Sandt, H., Wiemann, C. & Worth, A.P. (2002). Follow up to the ECVAM prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force Report 2. ATLA 30, 109-129.
24. de Silva, O., Basketter, D.A., Barratt, M.D., Corsini, E., Cronin, M.T.D., Das, P.K., Degwert, J., Enk, A., Garrigue, J.L., Hauser, C., Kimber, I., Lepoittevin, J.P., Peguet, J. & Ponec, M. (1996). Alternative methods for skin sensitisation testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 19. ATLA 24, 683-705.
25. Pichowski, J.S., Cumberbatch, M., Dearman, R.J., Basketter, D.A. & Kimber, I. (2000). Investigation of induced changes in Interleukin 1β mRNA expression by cultured human dentritic cells as an in vitro approach to skin sensitisation testing. Toxicology in Vitro 14, 351-360.
26. Smith, C. & Hotchkiss, S. (2001). Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Chemical and Metabolic Mechanisms, 344pp. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
27. Basketter, D., Gerberick, F. & Kimber, I. (2000). Validation in practice - the reality for skin sensitisation. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 395-399. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
28. Balls, M., De Klerck, W., Baker, F., Van Beck, M., Bouillon, C., Bruner, L., Carstensen, J., Chamberlain, M., Cottin, M., Dupuis, J., Faure, U., Fentem, J., Fisher, J., Galli, C., Kemper, F., Knaap, A., Langley, G., Loprieno, G., Loprieno, N., Pape, W., Pechovitch, G., Spielmann, H., Ungar, K., White, I. & Zuang, V. (1995). Development and validation of non-animal tests and testing strategies: the identification of a coordinated response to the challenge and the opportunity to the Cosmetics Directive (76/768/EEC). The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 7. ATLA 23, 398-409.
29. Rousset, F., Verda, D., Arrighi, J.F., Péguet-Navarro, J. & Cottin, M. (2000). A strategy for the prediction of skin sensitisation: an alternative to animal testing. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. M. Balls, A-M. van Zeller & M.E. Halder), pp. 635-642. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.