Freshwater inflow: Science, policy, management

Estuaries

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1243-1245

  Montagna, Paul A ^a   Alber, Merryl ^b   Doering, Peter ^c   Connor, Michael S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT   (United States)

^d NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT; FRESHWATER INPUT; INFLOW;

FLORIDA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036974483     PISSN: 01608347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02692221     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ADAMS, J. B., G. C. BATE, T. D. HARRISON, P. HUIZINGA, S. TALJAARD, L. VAN NIEKERK, E. E. PLUMSTEAD, A. K. WHITFIELD, AND T. H. WOOLDRIDGE. 2002. A method to assess the freshwater inflow requirements of estuaries and application to the Mtata estuary, South Africa. Estuaries 25:1382-1393.
2. ALBER, M. 2002. A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management. Estuaries 25:1246-1261.
3. COPELAND, B. J. 1966. Effects of decreased river flow on estuarine ecology. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 38:1831-1839.
4. CROSS, R. AND D. WILLIAMS (EDS.). 1981. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Freshwater Inflow to Estuaries. FWS/OBS-81/04. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services.
5. CULLITON, T. J. 1998. Population: Distribution, density and growth. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's State of the Coast Report. Silver Spring, Maryland.
6. DOERING, P. H., R. H. CHAMBERLAIN, AND D. E. HAUNERT. 2002. Using submerged aquatic vegetation to establish minimum and maximum freshwater inflows to the Caloosahatchee estuary, Florida. Estuaries 25:1343-1354.
7. DYNESIUS, M. AND C. NILSSON. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753-762.
8. FLANNERY, M. S., E. B. PEEBLES, AND R. T. MONTGOMERY. 2002. A percentage-of-streamflow approach for managing reductions of freshwater inflows from unimpounded rivers to southwest Florida estuaries. Estuaries 25:1318-1332.
9. HOESE, H. D. 1967. Effects of higher than normal salinities on salt marshes. Contributions to Marine Science 12:249-261.
10. KIMMERER, W. J. 2002. Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco estuary. Estuaries 25:1275-1290.
11. LONGLEY, W. L. (ED.). 1994. Freshwater inflows to Texas bays and estuaries: Ecological relationships and methods for determination of needs. Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.
12. MATTSON, R. A. 2002. A resource-based framework for establishing freshwater inflow requirements for the Suwannee River estuary. Estuaries 25:1333-1342.
13. MONTAGNA, P. A., R. D. KALKE, AND C. RITTER. 2002. Effect of restored freshwater inflow on macrofauna and meiofauna in upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USA. Estuaries 25:1436-1447.
14. NAIMAN, R. J., J. J. MAGNUSON, D. M. MCKNIGHT, J. A. STANFORD, AND J. R. KARR. 1995. Freshwater ecosystems and their management: A national initiative. Science 270:584-585.
15. POSTEL, S. L., G. C. DAILY, AND P. R. EHRLICH. 1996. Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271:785-788.
16. POWELL, G. L., J. MATSUMOTO, AND D. A. BROCK. 2002. Methods for determining minimum freshwater inflow needs of Texas bays and estuaries. Estuaries 25:1262-1274.
17. PRINGLE, C. M., M. C. FREEMAN, AND B. J. FREEMAN. 2000. Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: Tropical-temperate comparisons. BioScience 50:807-823.
18. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES. 1982. The influence of freshwater inflows upon the major bays and estuaries of the Texas Gulf coast. Report LP-115. Texas Department of Water Resources, Austin, Texas.
19. VÖROSMARTY, C. J. AND D. SAHAGIAN. 2000. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. BioScience 50:753-765.