Measurement system analysis: The usual metrics can be noninformative

Quality Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 293-298

  Larsen, Greg A ^a  

^a AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Measurement system analysis; P T ratio; S N ratio; Variance components

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ELECTRONICS; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; METRIC SYSTEM; PROBLEM SOLVING; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; SPECIFICATIONS; STANDARDS;

MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

MEASUREMENT THEORY;

EID: 0036972916     PISSN: 08982112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/QEN-120015861     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Vardeman, S.B.; VanValkenburg, E.S. Two-Way Random-Effects Analyses and Gauge R&R Studies. Technometrics 1999, 41 (3), 202-211.
2. Burdick, R.K.; Larsen, G.A. Confidence Intervals on Measures of Variability in R&R Studies. J. Qual. Technol. 1997, 29 (3), 261-273.
3. Mader, D.P.; Prins, J.; Lampe, R.E. The Economic Impact of Measurement Error. Qual. Eng. 1999, 11 (4), 563-574.
4. 4. Grubbs, F.E.; Coon, H.J. On Setting Test Limits Relative to Specification Limits. Ind. Qual. Control 1954, 10 (5), 15-20.
5. Graves, S.; Bisgaard, S. Five Ways Statistical Tolerancing Can Fail, and What to Do About Them. Qual. Eng. 2000, 13 (1), 73-82.