Radiological diagnosis during pregnancy;Radiologische diagnostik in der schwangerschaft

Onkologe

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1294-1301

  Hauth, E A M ^a   Antoch, G ^a   Debatin, J F ^a   Ruehm, S G ^a   Gocke, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CARCINOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONCEPTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HUMAN; LYMPHOMA; MELANOMA; NIDATION; PELVIMETRY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; THROMBOSIS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 0036970657     PISSN: 09478965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00761-002-0438-1     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Akeson P, Larsson EM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. (1995) Brain metastases-Comparison of gadodiamide injection-enhanced MR imaging at standard and high dose, contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Acta Radiol 36: 300-306
2. American Joint Committee on Cancer: Cancer Staging Manual ed 5 (1997), Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA, pp 171-180
3. Berman CG, Brodsky NJ (1998) In: Berman CG, Brodsky NJ, Clark RA (eds) The female genital tract. pp 224-231
4. Bernhardt JH, Kossel F (1984) Gesundheitliche Risiken bei der Anwendung von NMR-Tomographie und In-vivo-NMR-Spektroskopie. Röfo 141: 251-258
5. Bundesgesundheitsamt (1984) Empfehlungen zur Vermeidung gesundheitlicher Risiken, verursacht durch magnetische und hochfrequente elektromagnetische Felder bei der NMR-Tomographie und In-vivo-NMR-Spektroskopie. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 27: 92-96
6. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, et al. (1994) The Essential physics of medical imag-ing. Baltimore, Md, Williams and Wilkins
7. Callery C, Cochran AJ, Roe DJ et al. (1982) Factors prognostic for survival in patients with malignant melanoma spread to the regional lymph nodes. Ann Surg 196: 69
8. Carlson RW (1996) The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Practice Guidelines. Oncology 10 (Supp 11): 47-75
9. Cobby M, Browning J, Jones A, et al. (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol 63: 673-679
10. Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM, Sciuk J et al. (2001) Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. AJR 177: 229-236
11. Eustace S, Tello R, DeCawalho V, et al. (1997) A Comparison of whole-body turbo STIR MR imaging and planar 99m Tc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. AJR 169: 1655-1661
12. Feuerstein JM, Jicha DL, Pass HI, et al. (1992) Pulmonary metastases: MR imaging with surgical correlation-A prospective study. Radiology 182: 123-129
13. Hoane BR, Shields AF, Porter BA et al. (1994) Comparison of initial lymphoma staging using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Am J Hematol 47: 100-105
14. Holm J, Jacobsen B (1986) Accurancy of dynamic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions. J Ultrasound Med 5: 1-4
15. Kopans DB (1996) Mammography and radiation risk, in Radiation Risk: A Primer. American College of Radiology pp 21-22
16. Laubenberger TH, Laubenberger J (1999) Strahlenwirkung auf den menschlichen Körper. In Laubenberger TH, Laubenberger J (Hrsg) Technik der medizinischen Radiologie, 7. Aufl. Deutscher Ärzteverlag, Köln, S 500-501
17. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (1999) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 49: 8-31
18. Levine D, Barnes PD, Edelmann RR (1999) Obstetric MR imaging. Radiology 211: 609-617
19. Levine D, Barnes PD, Sher S et al. (1998) Fetal fast MR imaging: Reproducibilitiy, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 206: 549-554
20. Nicklas AH, Baker ME (2000) Imaging strategies in the pregnant cancer patient. Semin Oncol 27: 623-632
21. Praenatale Strahlenexposition aus medizinischer Indikation. Dosisermittlung, Folgerungen für Arzt und Schwangere (1990) DGMP- und DRG-Bericht Nr.7
22. Rosenthal DI (1997) Radiologic diagnosis of bone metastases. Cancer 80: 1595-1607
23. Sadural E, Smith LK (1995): Hematologic malignancies during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38: 535-546
24. Shetty MK, Lamki N (2001) Imaging of pelvic masses during pregnancy. J Women's Imaging 3: 63-68
25. Shinmoto H, Kashima K, Yuasa Y, et al. (2000) MR imaging of non-CNS fetal abnormalities: A pictorial essay. Radiographics 20: 1227-1243
26. Sigmund von G, Bauer M, Henne K, DeGregorio G, Wenz W (1991) Technik der kernspintomographischen Beckenmessung in der Geburtshilfe. Röfo 154: 370-374
27. Thomas SR (1996) Bioeffects of non-ionizing radiation, In: Reston VA, (ed) Radiation Risk: A Primer. American College of Radiology, pp 45-50
28. Timins J (2002) Pregnancy and Medical Radiation: Part I. J Womens's Imaging 4: 31-32
29. Urhahn von R, Lehnen R, Drobnitzky M, Klose K Ch, Günther RW (1991) Ultraschnelle Pelvimetrie mittels Snapshot-FLASH-MRT- Vergleich mit Spinecho- und FLASH-Technik. Röfo 155: 432-435
30. Verordnung zur Änderung der Röntgenverordnung und anderer atomrechtlicher Verordnungen vom 18. Juni 2002, Bundesgesetzblatt 2002
31. Wagner LK, Lester RG, Saldana LK (1997) Exposure of the pregnant patient to diagnostic radiations. Madison, WI, Medical Physics Publishing