Factor structure of MicroCog in a clinical sample

Applied Neuropsychology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 183-186

  Lopez, Shane J ^a   Sumerall, Scott W ^b   Ryan, Joseph J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b WILLIAM JEWELL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized assessment; MicroCog; Neuropsychological assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY; MICROCOG; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036969349     PISSN: 09084282     EISSN: 15324826     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324826AN0903_7     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Devivo, K., Rothland, J., Price, L., & Fein, G. (1997). Computerized assessment of arithmetic computation skills with MicroCog. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 199-200.
2. O'Keefe, K. E. (1997). Validation of a computerized neuropsychological test. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 1589.
3. Powell, D. H., Kaplan, E. F., Whitla, D., Weintraub, S., Catlin, R., & Funkenstein, H. H. (1993). MicroCog: Assessment of cognitive functioning: Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
4. Stewart, J. B. (1998). Possible confounding variables of computer-administered neuropsychological assessment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 889.