Are successful colonizers necessarily invasive species? The case of the so-called "invading parthenogenetic cockroach", Pycnoscelus surinamensis, in the Brazilian Atlantic forest

Revue d'Ecologie (La Terre et la Vie)

Volumn 57, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 253-261

  Pellens, Roseli ^a   Grandcolas, Philippe ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COCKROACH; COLONIZATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; RANGE EXPANSION;

BRAZIL;

BLABERIDAE; BLATTARIA; DICTYOPTERA; PYCNOSCELUS SURINAMENSIS;

EID: 0036968179     PISSN: 02497395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. CALLAWAY, R.M. & ASCHEHOUG, E.T. (2000). - Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: A mechanism for exotic invasion. Science, 290: 521-523.
2. CAREY, J.R., MOYLE, P., REJMÁNEK, M. & VERMEIJ, G. (1996). - Special issue: Invasion biology. Biol. Conserv., 78: 1-214.
3. CORNWELL, P.B. (1968). - The cockroach, A laboratory insect and industrial pest. Volume I. Hutchinson, London.
4. DI CASTRI, F. (1990). - On invading species and invaded ecosystems: the interplay of historical chance and biological necessity. Pp. 3-16, in: Di Castri, F., Hansen, A.J. & Debussche, M. (eds), Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
5. GRANDCOLAS, P. (1994a). - La richesse spécifique des communautés de blattes du sous-bois en forêt tropicale de Guyane française. Rev. Ecol. (Terre et Vie), 49: 139-150.
6. GRANDCOLAS, P. (1994b). - Les blattes de la forêt tropicale de Guyane française: structure du peuplement (Insecta, Dictyoptera, Blattaria). Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr., 119: 59-67.
7. GRANDCOLAS, P. (1998). - Domestic and non-domestic cockroaches: facts versus received ideas. Rev. fr. Allergol., 38: 833-838.
8. GRANDCOLAS, P., DEJEAN, A. & DELEPORTE, P. (1996). - The invading parthenogenetic cockroach: a natural history comment on Parker and Niklasson's study. J. Evol. Biol., 9: 1023-1026.
9. IBDF/FBCN, (1981). - Reserva Biológica de Sooretama: plano de manejo. Brasília, 70 p.
10. JESUS DE MORAES, R. (1987). - Mata Atlantica de Linhares: aspectos florestais. Pp. 35-71, in: Seminário sobre Desenvolvimento Econômico e Impacto Ambiental em áreas do trópico úmido brasileiro: a experiência da CVRD. SEMA, IWRB,CVRD. Rio de Janeiro.
11. JOLY, P. (2000). - Biological invasions. State of the art and perspectives. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie), Suppl. 7: 21-35.
12. LAURANCE, W.F., BIERREGAARD, R.O., GASCON, C., DIDHAM, R.K., SMITH, A.P., LYNAM, A.J., VIANA, V.M., LOVEJOY, T.E., SIEVING, K.E., SITES, J.W., ANDERSEN, M., TOCHER, M.D., KRAMER, E.A., RESTREPO, C. & MORITZ, C. (1997). - Tropical forest fragmentation: synthesis of a diverse and dynamic discipline. Pp. 502-514, in: Laurance, W.F. & Bierregaard, R.O. (eds), Tropical forest remnants. Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
13. LODGE, D.M. (1993). - Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 8: 133-137.
14. LUBIN, Y. D. (1984). - Changes in native fauna of the Galapagos Islands following invasion by the little red fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 21: 229-242.
15. MACK, R.N., SIMBERLOFF, D., LONSDALE, W.M., EVANS, H., CLOUT, M. & BAZZAZ, F.A. (2000). - Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl., 10: 689-710.
16. MORRISON, L.W. (2000). - Mechanisms of interspecific competition among an invasive and two native fire ants. Oikos, 90: 238-252.
17. NEUBERT, M.G. & CASWELL, H. (2000). - Demography and dispersal: calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology, 81: 1613-1628.
18. NIKLASSON, H. & PARKER, E.D. (1994). - Fitness variation in an invading parthenogenetic cockroach. Oikos, 71: 47-54.
19. NIKLASSON, M. & PARKER, E.D. (1996). - Human commensalism in relation to geographic parthenogenesis and colonizing/invading ability. J. Evol. Biol., 9: 1027-1028
20. PARKER, E.D. (1984). - Reaction norms of development rate among diploid clones of Pycnoscelus surinamensis. Evolution, 38: 791-805.
21. PARKER, E.D. & NIKLASSON, M. (1995). - Desiccation resistance among clones in the invading parthenogenetic cockroach, Pycnoscelus surinamensis: a search for the general-purpose genotype. J. Evol. Biol., 8: 331-337.
22. PARKER, E.D. & NIKLASSON, M. (2000). - Genetic structure and evolution in parthenogenetic animals. Pp. 456-474, in: Singh, R.S. & Krimbas, C.B. (eds), Evolutionary genetics. From molecules to morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. PARKER, E.D., SELANDER, R.K., HUDSON, R.O. & LESTER, L.J. (1977). - Genetic diversity in colonizing parthenogenetic cockroaches. Evolution, 31: 836-842.
24. PELLENS, R. & GARAY, I. (1999a). - A comunidade de macroartropodos edáficos em uma plantaçao de Coffea robusta Linden (Rubiaceae) e em uma floresta primaria em Linhares, Espírito Santo, Brasil. Rev. bras. Zool., 16: 245-258.
25. PELLENS, R. & GARAY, I. (1999b). - Edaphic macroarthropods communities in fast-growing plantations of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maid (Myrtaceae) and Acacia mangium Wild (Leguminosae) in Brazil. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 35: 77-89.
26. PYŠEK, P. (1997). - Clonality and plant invasions: can a trait make a difference? Pp. 405-427, in: H. de Kroon & J. Van Groenandel (eds), The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Leiden, Backhuys.
27. REHN, J.A.G. (1945). - Man's uninvited fellow-traveller - The cockroach. Sc. Monthly., 61: 265-276.
28. REJMÁNEK, M. (2000). - Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecol., 25: 497-506.
29. RICHARDSON, D.M., PYŠEK, P., REJMÁNEK, M., BARBOUR, M.G., PANETTA, F.D. & WEST, C.J. (2000). - Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6: 93-107.
30. ROTH, L.M. (1967). - Sexual isolation in parthenogenetic Pycnoscelus surinamensis and application of the name Pycnoscelus indicus to its bisexual relative (Dictyoptera: Blattaria: Blaberidae: Pycnoscelinae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 60: 774-779.
31. ROTH, L.M. (1974). - Reproductive potential of bisexual Pycnoscelus indicus and clones of its parthenogenetic relative, Pycnoscelus surinamensis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 67: 215-223.
32. ROTH, L.M. & WILLIS, E.R. (1960). - The biotic associations of cockroaches. Smithson. Misc. Coll., 141: 1-470.
33. ROTH, L.M. & WILLIS, E.R. (1961). - A study of bisexual and parthenogenetic strains of Pycnoscelus surinamensis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 54: 12-25.
34. RUSSO, E. (2000). - Colonization, not invasion. The Scientist, 14: 22.
35. SAX, D.F. & BROWN, J.H. (2000). - The paradox of invasion. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 9: 363-371.
36. SCHAL, C. & BELL, W.J. (1986). - Vertical community structure and resource utilization in neotropical forest cockroaches. Ecol. Entomol., 11: 411-423.
37. SOL, D. & LEFEBVRE, L. (2000). - Behavioural flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos, 90: 599-605.
38. SOS Mata Atlântica/INPE/ISA, (1998). Atlas da evolução da Mata Atlântica. [http://www.sosmatatlantica.org.br/].
39. WILLIAMSON, M. (1996). - Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, London.
40. WILLIAMSON, M. & FITTER, A. (1996a). - The characters of successful invaders. Biol. Conserv., 78: 163-170.
41. WILLIAMSON, M. & FITTER, A. (1996b). - The varying success of invaders. Ecology, 77: 1661-1666.
42. WILSON, J.B. & LEE, W.G. (1989). - Infiltration invasion. Funct. Ecol., 3: 379-380.