Phonological similarity in American Sign Language

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 593-612

  Hildebrandt, Ursula ^a   Corina, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NATIVE SPECIES; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SIGN LANGUAGE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0036967314     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960143000371     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Battison, R. (1974). Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 3(5), 1-19.
2. Bellugi, U. (1980). The structuring of language: Clues from the similarities between signed and spoken languages. In U. Bellugi & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Signed and spoken language: Biological constraints on linguistic form. Weinheim/Deerfield Beach, FL: Verlag Chemie.
3. Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1981). Syllables as units in infant speech perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 4, 247-260.
4. Blondel, M., & Miller, C. (1998, December). The relation between poetry and phonology: Movement and rhythm in nursery rhymes in LSF. Paper presented at the 2nd Intersign Workshop, Leiden, Germany.
5. Brentari, D. (1990). Licensing in ASL handshape change. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Theoretical issues in American Sign Language research II (pp. 57-68). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
6. Chinchor, N. (1978). The syllable in American Sign Language: Sequential and simultaneous phonology. Paper presented at the MIT Sign Language Symposium, Cambridge, MA.
7. Cohn, J. (1986). The new deaf poetics: Visable poetry. Sign Language Studies, 52, 263-277.
8. Corina, D.P. (1990). Handshape assimilations in hierarchical phonological representation. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Theoretical issues in American Sign Language Research II (pp. 27-49). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
9. Coulter, G.R. & Anderson, S.R. (1992). Introduction. In G.R. Coulter (Ed.), Current issues in ASL phonology, New York: Academic Press.
10. Eimas, P. (1985). The perception of speech in early infancy. Scientific American, 252, 46-61.
11. Emmorey, K., Bellugi, U., Friederici, A., & Horn, P. (1995). Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 1-23.
12. Emmorey, K., & Corina, D.P. (1990). Lexcial recognition in sign language: Effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1227-1252.
13. Klima, E.S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Kuhl, P. (1983). Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 6, 263-285.
15. Lane, H. (1984). When the mind hears. A history of the deaf. New York: Random House.
16. Lane, H., Boyes-Braem, P., & Bellugi, U. (1976). Preliminaries to a distinctive feature analysis of American Sign Language. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 263-289.
17. Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F.W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201-212.
18. Liddell, S.K., & Johnson, R.E. (1985). American Sign Language: The phonological base. Unpublished manuscript, Gallaudet University.
19. Mayberry, R.I. (1993). The importance of childhood to language acquisition: Evidence from American Sign Language. In J.C. Goodman & H.C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 57-90). Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford books.
20. Mayberry, R.I., & Eichen, E.B. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 486-512.
21. Mayberry, R.I., & Fischer, S.D. (1989). Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing. Memory and Cognition, 17, 740-754.
22. Medin, D.L., Goldstone, R.L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
23. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J.Y., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning, 20 298-305.
24. Newport, E.L. (1990). Maturational constrains on language learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 11-28.
25. Padden, C.A., & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Padden, C.A. & Perlmutter, D.M. (1987). American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 335-375.
27. Perlmutter, D. (1992). Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. In G. Coulter (Ed.), Phonetics and phonology, Volume 3: Current issues in ASL phonology (pp. 227-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Poizner, H. (1983). Perception of movement in American Sign Language: Effects of linguistic structure and linguistic experience. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 215-231.
29. Poizner, H., & Lane, H. (1978). Discrimination of location in American Sign Language. In P. Siple (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 271-287). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Rose, H. (1992). A semiotic analysis of artistic American Sign Language and a performance of poetry. Text and Performance Quarterly, 12, 146-159.
31. Sandler, W. (1986). The spreading hand autosegment of ASL. Sign Language Studies, 15, 1-28.
32. Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and non-linearity in American Sign Language phonology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris Publications.
33. Sandler, W. (1993). Sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology, 10, 243-279.
34. Stokoe, W.C., Casterline, D., & Croneberg, C. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
35. Stungis, J. (1981). Identification and discrimination of handshape in American Sign Language. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 261-276.
36. Treiman, R., & Danis, C. (1988). Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 145-152.
37. Treiman, R. (1995). Errors in short-term memory for speech: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1197-1207.
38. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
39. Tversky, A., & Grati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 79-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
40. Valli, C. (1990). The nature of line in ASL poetry. In W.H. Edmondson & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Sign Language Research 1987: Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research (pp. 171-182). Hamburg, Germany: Signum Verlag.