On the use of historical control information for trend test in carcinogenesis

Biometrics

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 917-927

  Ma, Yanping ^a,b   Guo, Jianhua ^a,c   Shi, Ning Zhong ^a   Tang, Man Lai ^d  

^a NORTHEAST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Beta binomial distribution; Historical controls; Level probability; Maximum likelihood estimation; Trend test

Indexed keywords

PATHOLOGY;

BETA-BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; CARCINOGENESES; HISTORICAL CONTROL; HISTORICAL CONTROL INFORMATIONS; LEVEL PROBABILITY; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MODEL-BASED OPC; SIGNIFICANCE TEST; SIMPLE++; TREND TESTS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

BIOMETRY; CARCINOGEN; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CANCER CONTROL; CARCINOGENESIS; CONTROL SYSTEM; DATA ANALYSIS; HISTORY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036966526     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00917.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Armitage, P. (1955). Test for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11, 375-386.
2. Bohrer, R. and Chow, W. (1978). Algorithm AS 122: Weights for one-sided multivariate inference. Applied Statistics 27, 100-104.
3. 2 test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23, 315-345.
4. 2 tests. Biometrics 10, 417-451
5. Copas, J. B. (1972). Empirical Bayes methods and the repeated use of a standard. Biometrika 59, 349-360.
6. Dempster, A. P., Selwyn, M. R., and Weeks, B. J. (1983). Combining historical and randomized controls for assessing trends in proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78, 221-227.
7. Hoel, D. G. and Yanagawa, T. (1986). Incorporating historical controls in testing for a trend in proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 396, 1095-1099.
8. Kudô, A. (1963). A multivariate analogue of the one-sided test. Biometrika 50, 403-418.
9. Mack, G. A. and Wolfe, D. A. (1981). K-sample rank tests for umbrella alternatives. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76, 175-181.
10. 2O) for possible carcinogenicity. Technical Report 6, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
11. National Cancer Institute. (1977b). Bioassay of phenformin for possible carcinogenicity. Technical Report 7. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
12. Plackett, R. L. (1981). The Analysis of Categorical Data, 2nd edition. London: Charles W. Griffin.
13. Prentice, R. L., Smythe, R. T., Krewski, D., and Mason, M. (1992). On the use of historical control data to estimate dose response trends in quantal bioassay. Biometrics 48, 459-478.
14. Sheps, M. C. (1958). Shall we count the living or the dead? New England Journal of Medicine 259, 1210-1214.
15. Sheps, M. C. (1959). An examination of some methods of comparing several rates or proportions. Biometrics 15, 87-97.
16. Shi, N.-Z. (1991). A test of homogeneity of odds ratios against order restrictions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 154-158.
17. Tamura, R. N. and Young, S. S. (1986). The incorporation of historical control information in tests of proportions: Simulation of Tarone's procedure. Biometrics 42, 343-350.
18. Tarone, R. E. (1982). The use of historical control information in testing for a trend in proportions. Biometrics 38, 215-220.
19. Tarone, R. E. and Gart, J. J. (1980). On the robustness of combined tests for trends in proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75, 110-116.