Air reduction of intussusception

European Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 387-390

  Rubi, I ^a,c   Vera, R ^a   Rubi, S C ^b   Torres, E E ^c   Luna, A ^b   Arcos, J ^b   Paredes, R ^b   Rodriguez, J ^b   Velasco, B ^b   Garcia, M ^b  

^a HOSPITAL REGIONAL UNIVERSITARIO DE MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^b Hospital General de Jaen   (Spain)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Air pressure; Enema; Equipment and supplies; Infant; Insufflation; Intussusception; Pneumoradiography

Indexed keywords

AIR ENEMA; ARTICLE; BARIUM ENEMA; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE PERFORATION; INTUSSUSCEPTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRESSURE; RECURRENT DISEASE; SAFETY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AIR; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ENEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INTUSSUSCEPTION; MALE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036964898     PISSN: 09397248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36852     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brenn BR, Katz A. General anaesthesia may improve the success rate of hydrostatic reductions of intussusception. Paediatr Anaesth 1997; 7: 77-81
2. Britton I, Wilkinson AG. Ultrasound features of intussusception predicting the outcome of air enema. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29: 705-710
3. Connolly B et al. Partially reduced intussusception: When are repeated delayed reduction attempts appropriate? Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25: 104-107
4. Daneman A et al. Patterns of recurrence of intussusception in children: A 17-year review. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28: 913-919
5. Ein SH et al. Intussusception in the 1990 s: Has 25 years made a difference? Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12: 374-376
6. Fecteau A et al. Recurrent intussusception: Safe use of hydrostatic enema. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 859-861
7. Fiorito ES, Recalde LA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute intestinal intussusception with controlled insufflation of air. Paediatrics 1959; 24: 241-244
8. González-Spinolaj et al. Intussusception: The accuracy of ultrasound-guided saline enema and the usefulness of a delayed attempt at reduction. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 1016-1020
9. Gorenstein A et al. Intussusception in children: Reduction with repeated delayed air enema. Radiology 1998; 206: 721-724
10. Gu L et al. Sonographic guidance of air enema for intussusception reduction in children. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30: 339-342
11. Hadidi AT, El Shal N. Childhood intussusception: A comparative study of nonsurgical management. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 304-307
12. Heenan SD et al. Effective dose at pneumatic reduction of paediatric intussusception. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 811-816
13. Le Masne A et al. Intussusception in infants and children: Feasibility of ambulatory management. Eur J Pediatr 1999; 158: 707-710
14. Persliden J et al. Comparison of absorbed radiation doses in barium and air enema reduction of intussusception: A phantom study, Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26: 329-332
15. Ravitch MM. Intussusception. In: Mustard WT, Ravitch MM, Snyder WH Jr, Welch KJ, Benson CD (eds). Pediatric Surgery. Vol 2, 2nd ed. Chicago: Year Book Med Publ, 1969: 914-931
16. Sandler AD et al. Unsuccessful air-enema reduction of intussusception: Is a second attempt worthwhile? Pediatr Surg Int 1999; 15: 214-216
17. She Ya-Xiong. Traitement de l'invagination intestinale avec regard special sur la réduction par l'insufflation du côlon. Chir Pediatr 1982; 23: 373-378
18. Wang G et al. Nonfluoroscopic reduction of intussusception by air enema. World J Surg 1995; 19: 435-438