Decisions, decisions: Analysis of age, cohort, and time of testing on framing of risky decision options

Human Factors

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 515-521

  Mayhorn, Christopher B ^a   Fisk, Arthur D ^b   Whittle, Justin D ^c  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Delta Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BENCHMARKING; DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION MAKING;

TIME-OF-TESTING EFFECTS;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; RISK;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; BENCHMARKING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RISK-TAKING;

EID: 0036963745     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/0018720024496935     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Consumer inflation calculator. (1999). Retrieved January 3, 2003, from http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/bu2/inflateCPI.html
2. Craik, F. I. M., & Salthouse, T. A. (2000). The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., & Pill, R. (2001). Presenting risk information - A review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Heath Communication, 6, 61-82.
4. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1997). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 355-373.
5. Goldstein, W. M., & Hogarth, R. M. (1997). Research on judgment and decision-making: Currents, connections, and controversies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Kuhberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
7. Sanfey, A. G., & Hastie, R. (2000). Judgment and decision-making across the adult life span: A tutorial review of psychological research. In D. C. Park & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 253-273). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
8. Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
9. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 289-317.
10. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
11. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1988). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision-making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 167-192). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). Current population reports, special studies, P23-190, 65+ in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
14. Wiseman, D. B., & Levin, L. P. (1996). Comparing risky decision making under conditions of real and hypothetical consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 241-250.
15. Yates, J. F., & Palatano, A. L. (1999). Decision making and aging. In D. C. Park, R. W. Morrell, & K. Shifren (Eds.), Processing of medical information in aging patients (pp. 31-54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Zeitlin, L. R. (1994). Failure to follow safety instructions: Faulty communication or risky decisions? Human Factors, 36, 172-181.