Governing institutions, ideologies, and gender: Toward the possibility of equal political representation

Sex Roles

Volumn 47, Issue 7-8, 2002, Pages 371-388

  Duerst Lahti, Georgia ^a  

^a BELOIT COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

gender; ideology; institutions; representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036959067     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021435215864     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139-158
2. Acker, J. (1992). Gendered institutions: From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Society, 21, 565-566.
3. Alvesson, M., & Billings, Y. D. (1997). Understanding gender & organizations. London: Sage.
4. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1963). Decisions and non-decisions: An analytic framework. American Political Science Review, 53, 632-642.
5. Barrett, M. (1980). Women's oppression today: Problems in Marxist feminist analysis. London: Verso Books.
6. Bingham, C. (1997). Women on the hill: Challenging the culture of Congress. New York: Times Books.
7. Brod, H., & Kaufman, M. (1994). Theorizing masculinities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Brown, W. (1995). States of injury. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Brown, W. (1988). Manhood and politics. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
10. Burrell, B. C. (1994). A woman's place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the feminist era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
12. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the limits to discursive "sex." New York: Routledge.
13. Cantor, D. & Bernay, T. (1992). Women in power: The secrets of leadership. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Carroll, S. J. (2001). The impact of women in public office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15. Carroll, S. J., & Schreiber, R. (1997). Media coverage of women in the 103rd Congress. In P. Norris (Ed.), Women, media, and politics (pp. 131-148). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Carroll, S. J., & Zerilli, L. M. G. (1993). Feminist challenges to political science. In A.W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 55-79). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
17. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
18. Congressional Management Foundation. (1999). Summary of key findings for 1999 Senate staff employment study. Retrieved August 9, 2002, from http://188.221.20/cmf/templdisplay2/cf,?id+241
19. Congressional Management Foundation. (2000). Summary of key findings for 2000 House staff employment study. Retrieved August 9, 2002, from http://188.221.20/cmf/templdisplay2/cf,?id+246
20. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. Cook, T. (1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. DiStefano, C. (1983). Masculinity as ideology in political theory: Hobbesian man reconsidered. Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 633-644.
23. DiStefano, C. (1991). Configurations of masculinity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Dodson, D. (1991). Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics.
25. Dodson, D., Carroll, S. J., Mandel, R. B., Kleeman, K. E., Schreiber, R., & Liebowitz, D. (1995). Voices, views, and votes: The impact of women in the 103rd Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics.
26. Duerst-Lahti, G. (1990). But women play the game too: Communication control and influence in administrative decision making. Administration and Society, 22, 182-205.
27. Duerst-Lahti, G. (2001, March). Conservative women's political thought, gender ideology, and the necessity of feminalism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Las Vegas.
28. Duerst-Lahti, G. (2002). Knowing Congress as a gendered institution: Maniliness and the implications of women in Congress. In C. S. Rosenthal (Ed.), Women transforming Congress (pp. 20-49). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
29. Duerst-Lahti, G., & Kelly, R. M. (1995). Gender power, leadership, and governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30. Eisenstein, Z. (1979). Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
31. Eisenstein, Z. (1981). The radical future of liberal feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
32. Eisenstein, Z. (2001). Manmade breast cancer. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33. Elshtain, J. B. (1981). Public man, private woman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34. Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
35. Ferguson, K. E. (1993). The man question. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Foerstel, K., & Foerstel, H. N. (1996). Climbing the hill: Gender conflict in Congress. Westport, CT: Praeger.
37. Fox-Genovese, E. (1996). Feminism is not the story of my life. New York: Doubleday.
38. Freeman, J. (1995). From seeds to harvest: Transformations of feminist organizations and scholarship. In M. M. Ferree & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women's movement (pp. 397-408). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
39. Funk & Wagnall's Dictionary. (1997). New York: World.
40. Guy, M. E. (1992). Women and men of the states. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
41. Hale, M. & Kelly, R. M. (1989). Gender, bureaucracy, & democrocracy. New York: Greenwood Press.
42. Hartman, H. I. (1979). Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex. In Z. Eisenstein (Ed.), Capitalist patriarchy and the case for socialist feminism (pp. 206-247). New York: Monthly Review Press.
43. Hartman, H. I. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and revolution (pp. 1-41). Boston: South End Press.
44. Hartsock, N. C. M. (1983). Money, sex, and power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
45. Hawkesworth, M., Dodson, D., Kleeman, K. E., Casey C. J., & Jenkins, K. (2001). Legislating by and for women: A comparison of the 103rd and 104th Congresses. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics.
46. Hearn, J. (1992). Men in the public eye. London: Routledge.
47. Hearn, J., Sheppard, D. L., Tancred-Sheriff, P., & Burrell, G. (1989). The sexuality of organization. London: Sage.
48. Hill, A. F. (2002, June 6). Insider women with outsider values. New York Times, P. 31.
49. Holland, C. A. (2001). The body politic: Foundings, citizenship, and difference in American political imagination. New York: Routledge.
50. Hoover, K. (1994). Ideology and political life (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
51. Jackman, J. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52. Jaggar, A. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allandheld.
53. Jewell, M. E., & Whicker, M. L. (1993). The feminization of leadership. PS, 26, 705-711.
54. Jewell, M. E., & Whicker, M. L. (1994). Legislative leadership in the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
55. Johnson, C. M., Duerst-Lahti, G., & Norton, N. (2002). Making masculine mothers: Gender ideology in welfare policy. Manuscript in preparation.
56. Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman. New York: Columbia University Press.
57. Kann, M. E. (1991). On the man question: Gender and civic virtue in America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
58. Kann, M. E. (1998). A republic of men: The American founders, gendered languages, and patriarchal politics. New York: New York University Press.
59. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
60. Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policy-making: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 99, 560-576.
61. Kathlene, L. (1995). Position power versus gender power: Who holds the floor. In G. Duerst-Lahti & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Gender power, leadership, and governance (pp. 167-194). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62. Kathlene, L. (2001). Words that matter: Women's voice and institutional bias in policy formation. In S. J. Carroll (Ed.), The impact of women in public office (pp. 22-48). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
63. Katzenstein, M. F. (1998). Faithful and fearless: Moving feminist protest inside the church and military. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
64. Kenney, S. J. (1996). Field essay: New research on gendered political institutions. Political Research Quarterly, 49, 445-466.
65. Kerber, L. K. (1997). Toward an intellectual history of women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
66. Kerber, L. K. (1980). Women of the republic: Intellect and ideology in revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
67. Kimmel, M. (1995). The politics of manhood. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
68. Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America. New York: Free Press.
69. Kropf, M. E. & Boiney, J. A. (2001). The electoral glass ceiling? Gender, viability, and the news in U.S. Senate campaigns. Women & Politics 23:79-104.
70. Levy, D., Tien, C., & Aved, R. (2001). Do differences matter? Women members of Congress and the Hyde Amendment. Women and Politics, 23, 105-128.
71. Lorber, J. (1979). Trust, loyalty, and the place of women in the informal organization of work. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (2nd ed., pp. 371-381). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
72. Lorber, J. (1987). Believing is seeing: Biology as ideology. Gender and Society, 2, 125-151.
73. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
74. Maddox, S. (1999). Challenging women: Gender, culture, and organization. London: Sage.
75. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
76. May, L., Strikwerda, R., & Hopkins, P. D. (1996). Rethinking masculinity: Philosophical explorations in light of feminism (2nd. ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
77. Mezey, S. G. (1992). In pursuit of equality: Women, public policy, and the federal courts. New York: St. Martin's Press.
78. Mikulski, B., Hutchinson, K. B., Feinstein, D., Boxer, B., Murray, P., Snowe, O., et al. (2000). Nine and counting: The women of the senate. New York: William Morrow.
79. Mills, A. J., & Tancred, P. (1992). Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
80. Nelson, B. (1992). The role of sex and gender in comparative political analysis: Individuals, institutions, and regimes. American Political Science Review, 86, 491-502.
81. Niven, D. & Zilber, J. (2001). "How does she have time for kids and Congress?" Views on gender and media coverage from the House. Women and Politics, 23, 140-166.
82. Norton, N. (1995). Women, it's not enough to be elected: Committee position makes a difference. In G Duerst-Lahti and R. M. Kelly (Ed.), Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
83. Norton, N. (1999). Uncovering the dimensionality of gender voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23, 65-85.
84. Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
85. Phillips, A. (1991). Engendering democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
86. Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
87. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
88. Rosenthal, C. S. (1998). When women lead. New York: Oxford University Press.
89. Rosenthal, C. S. (2002). Women transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
90. Sapiro, V. (1991). Gender politics, gendered politics: The state of the field. In W. J. Crotty (Ed.), Political science: Looking to the future (pp. 165-188). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
91. Schochet, G. J. (1975). Patriarchalism in political thought: The authoritarian family and political speculation and attitudes especially in seventeenth-century England. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
92. Schroeder, P. (1998). Twenty-four years of House work- and the place is still a mess: My lief in politics. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McNeel.
93. Shanley, M. L. (2001). Making babies, making families. Boston: Beacon Press.
94. Shapiro, J. (1991). Transexualism: Reflections on the persistence of gender and the mutability of sex. In J. Epstein & K. Straub (Eds.), Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity (pp. 248-279). New York: Routledge.
95. Sherman, J. (2001). No place for a woman. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
96. Shklar, J. (1997). Political thought and ideology. In P. Schumaker, D. C. Kiel, & T. W. Heilke (Eds.), Ideological voices (pp. 4-14). New York: McGraw-Hill.
97. Shogan, C. (2001). Speaking out: An analysis of Democratic and Republican women-invoked rhetoric of the 105th Congress. Women and Politics, 23, 129-146.
98. Tamerius, K. L. (1995). Sex, gender, and leadership in the representation of women. In G. Duerst-Lahti & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Gender power, leadership, and governance (pp. 93-112). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
99. Thomas, S. (1994). How women legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
100. Thomas, S., & Wilcox, C. (1998). Women and elective office: Past, present, and future. New York: Oxford University Press.
101. Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
102. Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
103. Walby, S. (1997). Gender transformations. London: Routledge.
104. Waters, M. (1989). Patriarchy and viriarchy, Sociology, 23, 193-211.
105. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125-151.
106. Williams, M. S. (1998). Voice, trust, memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
107. Wood, G. S. (1991). The radicalism of the American revolution. New York: Vintage.
108. Young, J. S. (1966). The Washington community, 1800-1828. New York: Columbia University Press.
109. Young, I. M. (1997). Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective. In I. M. Young (Ed.), Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy (pp. 12-37). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
110. Zerilli, L. M. G. (1994). Signifying women: Culture and chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.