Mating success and alternative reproductive strategies of the dimorphic jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae, Salticidae)

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 511-518

  Clark, David L ^a   Biesiadecki, Brandon ^a,b  

^a ALMA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative reproductive strategies; Dimorphism; Jumping spider; Mating success

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE; INVERTEBRATA; MAEVIA; MAEVIA INCLEMENS; SALTICIDAE;

EID: 0036957883     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0511:MSAARS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andersson, M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widow bird. Nature, London 299:818-820.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Arak, A. 1984. Sneaky Breeders. Pp. 154-194. In Producers and Scroungers: Strategies of Exploitation and Parasitism, (C.J. Barnard, ed.). Croom Helm, London.
4. Austad, S.N. 1984. A classification of alternative reproductive behaviors and methods for fieldtesting ESS models. American Zoologist 24(2): 309-320.
5. Barnes, R.D. 1955. North American jumping spiders of the genus Maevia. American Museum Novitates 1746:1-13.
6. Christenson, T.E. 1984. Alternative reproductive tactics in spiders. American Zoologist 24(2): 321-332.
7. Clark, S.J. 1988. The effects of operational sex ratio and food deprivation on copulation duration in the water strider (Gerris remigis Say). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 23:317-322.
8. Clark, D.L. 1992. Male Dimorphism and Species Recognition in the Jumping Spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.
9. Clark, D.L. 1994. Sequence analysis of courtship behavior in the dimorphic jumping spider, Maevia inclemens. Journal of Arachnology 22:94-107.
10. Clark, D. L. & G. W. Uetz. 1992. Morph-independent mate selection in a dimorphic jumping spider: demonstration of movement bias in female choice using video-controlled courtship behavior. Animal Behaviour 43:247-254.
11. Clark, D.L. & G.W. Uetz. 1993. Signal efficacy and the evolution of male dimorphism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90:11954-11957.
12. Cohen, J. 1969. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press, New York and London.
13. Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London, John Murray.
14. Dunbar, R.I.M. 1982. Intraspecific variations in mating strategy. Pp. 385-431. In Perspectives in Ethology, vol. 5, (P.P.G. Bateson & P.H. Klopfer, eds.). New York, Plenum Press.
15. Endler, J.A. 1980. Natural Selection on Color Patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76-91.
16. Emerton, J.H. 1961. The Common Spiders of the United States. Dover Publications Inc., New York.
17. Fernandez-Montraveta, C. & J. Ortega. 1990. Some aspects of the reproductive behavior of Lycosa tarentula faschventris (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 18:257-262.
18. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
19. Forster, L.M. 1982a. Visual communication in jumping spiders (Salticidae). Pp. 161-212. In Spider Communication, Mechanisms and Ecological Significance, (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds.), Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
20. Futuyma, D.J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology, 2nd Ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers.
21. Gadgil, M. 1972. Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection. American Naturalist 106:574-580.
22. Gadgil, M. & C.E. Taylor. 1975. Plausible models of sexual selection and polymorphism. American Naturalist 112:470-472.
23. Greene, E. 1989. A Diet-Induced Developmental Polymorphism in a Caterpillar. Science 243:643-646.
24. Heinemann, S. & G. Uhl. 2000. Male dimorphism in Oedothorax gibbosus (Araneae, Linyphiidae): Amorphometric analysis. Journal of Arachnology 28:23-28.
25. Howard, R.D. 1978. The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbiana. Evolution 32:850-871.
26. Jackson, R. R. 1980. The mating strategy of Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae, Salticidae): II. Sperm competition and the function of copulation. Journal of Arachnology 8:217-240.
27. Jackson, R.R. 1982. The behavior of communicating in jumping spiders (Salticidae). Pp. 213-247. In Spider Communication, Mechanisms and Ecological Significance, (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
28. Jenni, D.A. 1974. Evolution of polyandry in birds. American Zoologist 14:129-144.
29. Kaston, B.J. 1972. How to know the spiders. Wm. C. Brown Co. Dubuque, Iowa, USA.
30. Krebs, J.R. & N.B. Davies. 1987. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (2nd ed.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford London.
31. Lank, D. B., C. M. Smith, O. Hanotte, T. Burke, & F. Cooke. 1995. Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating strategies in lekking male ruff, Philomachus pugnax. Nature 378:183-185.
32. Le Boeuf, B. J. 1974. Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. American Zoologist 14:163-176.
33. Lott, D. F. 1991. Intraspecific Variation in the Social Systems of Wild Vertebrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Maynard Smith, J. 1988. Can a mixed strategy be stable in a finite population? Journal of Theoretical Biology 130:247-251.
35. Moodie, G. E. E. 1972. Predation, natural selection and adaptation in an unusual three-spirted stickleback. Heredity 28:155-167.
36. Painter, T.S. 1913. On the Dimorphism of the males of Maevia vittata, Zoologische Jahrbucher 37: 625-636.
37. Painter, T.S. 1914. Spermatogenesis in spiders. Zoologische Jahrbucher 38:509-576.
38. Peckham, G.W. & E.G. Peckham. 1889. Observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae. Occasional Papers Wisconsin Natural History Society 1:3-60.
39. Peckham, G.W. & E.G. Peckham. 1890. Additional observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae. Occasional Papers Wisconsin Natural History Society 1:117-151.
40. Reeves, C. D. 1907. The breeding habits of the rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum), a study in sexual selection. Biological Bulletin 14:35-59.
41. Reynolds, J.D., M.R. Gross, & M.J. Coombs. 1993. Environmental conditions and male morphology determine alternative mating behaviour in Trinidadian guppies. Animal Behaviour 45:145-152.
42. Rubenstein, D.I. 1980. On the evolution of alternative mating strategies. Pp. 65-100. In Limits to Action: The Allocation of Individual Behavior, (J.E.R. Staddon, ed.). New York, London, Acad. Press.
43. Trivers, R. L. 1976. Sexual selection and resource-accruing abilities in Anolis garmani. Evolution 30:253-269.
44. Vinnedge, B. & P. Verrel. 1998. Variance in male mating success and female choice for persuasive courtship displays. Animal Behaviour 56:443-448.
45. Wilson, E.O. 1971. The insect Societies. Belknap Press, Harvard.