Multifocal electroretinogram: Age-related changes for different luminance levels

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 240, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 202-208

  Gerth, Christina ^a   Garcia, Susan M ^a   Ma, Lei ^a   Keltner, John L ^a   Werner, John S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LUMINANCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; RETINA; SCHOOL CHILD; SENESCENCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; CHILD; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETINA;

EID: 0036956564     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-002-0442-6     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anzai K, Mori K, Murayama K, Yoneya S (1997) Normal values and their variation with age in multifocal electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:S881
2. Birch DG, Anderson JL (1992) Standardized full-field electroretinography. Normal values and their variation with age. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1571-1576
3. Brown B, Yap MKH (1996) Contrast and luminance as parameters defining the output of the VERIS topographical ERG. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 16:42-48
4. Curcio CA, Millican CL, Allen KA, Kalina RE (1993) Aging of the human photoreceptor mosaic: evidence for selective vulnerability of rods in central retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:3278-3296
5. Fortune B, Johnson CA (2002) The decline of photopic multifocal electroretinogram responses with age is primarily due to pre-retinal optical factors. J Opt Soc Am A 19:173-184
6. Gao H, Hollyfield JG (1992) Aging of the human retina. Differential loss of neurons and retinal pigment epithelium cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:1-17
7. Hennelly ML, Barbur JL, Edgar DF, Woodward EG (1998) The effect of age on the light scattering characteristics of the eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18:197-203
8. Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, Greenstein V (1997) A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs. Vis Neurosci 14:533-544
9. IJspeert JK, de Waard PW, van den Berg TJ, de Jong PT (1990) The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy volunteers; dependence on angle, age and pigmentation. Vision Res 30:699-707
10. Jackson RG, Ortega JDL, Girkin C, Rosenstiel CE, Owsley C (2002) Aging-related changes in the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am A. 19:185-189
11. Judd CM, McClelland GH (1989) Data analysis: a model comparison approach. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego
12. Judd CM, McClelland GH, Smith ER (1996) Testing treatment by covariate interactions when treatment varies within subjects. Psychol Methods 1:366-378
13. Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
14. Knau HK, Werner JS (2000) Senescence of the human cone photoreceptor pathways. In: Lakshminarayanan V (ed) Trends in optics and photonics, vol 35, Vision science and its applications V. Optical Society of America, Washington, DC, pp 382-392
15. Korczyn DA, Laor N, Nemet P (1976) Sympathetic pupillary tone in old age. Arch Ophthalmol 94:1905-1906
16. Marmor MF, Hood D, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger M, Miyake Y (for the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision) (2001) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). http://www.iscev.org
17. Marshall J (1978) Aging changes in human cones. In: Shimizu K, Oosterhuis JA (eds) XXIII Concilium Ophthalmologicum, Kyoto. Elsevier North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp 375-378
18. Mohidin N, Yap MKH, Jacobs RJ (1999) Influence of age on the multifocal electroretinography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19:481-488
19. Nagatomo A, Nao-i N, Maruiwa F, Arai M, Sawada A (1998) Multifocal electroretinograms in normal subjects. Jpn J Ophthalmol 42:129-135
20. Norren DV, Vos JJ (1974) Spectral transmission of the human ocular media. Vision Res 14:1237-1244
21. Palmowski AM, Bearse MA, Sutter EE (1997) Variability and replicability of the ERG topography in normals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:S877
22. Peterson H (1968) The normal B-potential in the single-flash clinical electroretinogram. A computer technique study of the influence of sex and age. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 99:7-77
23. Schefrin BE, Werner JS, Plach M, Utlaut N, Switkes E (1992) Sites of age-related sensitivity loss in a short-wave cone pathway. J Opt Soc Am A 9:355-363
24. Seeliger MW, Kretschmann UH, Apfelstaedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E (1998) Implicit time topography of multifocal electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:718-723
25. Sutter EE, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32:433-446
26. Verdon WA, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G (1998) Topography of the multifocal electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 95:73-90
27. Weleber RG (1981) The effect of age on human cone and rod Ganzfeld electroretinograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20:392-399
28. Werner JS, Bieber ML, Schefrin BE (2000) Senescence of foveal and parafoveal cone sensitivities and their relation to macular pigment density. J Opt Soc Am A 17:1918-1932
29. Wolf E (1960) Glare and age. Arch Ophthalmol 64:502-514
30. Wright CE, Williams DE, Drasdo N, Harding GFA (1985) The influence of age on the electroretinogram and visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 59:365-384