Active ethics: Philosophy, cases, and writing

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 2002, Pages

  Sanford Bernhardt, Kristen L ^a   Roth, Mary J S ^a  

^a LAFAYETTE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Case studies; Engineering ethics; Moral philosophy; Writing

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; TECHNICAL WRITING;

CASE STUDIES; ETHICS; MORAL PHILOSOPHY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 0036949357     PISSN: 01905848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Engineering Accreditation Committee, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations During the 2001-2002 Evaluation Cycle, Accrediatation Board of Engineering and Technology, Baltimore Maryland, 2000.
2. Pfatteicher, S.K.A., "Teaching vs. Preaching: EC2000 and the Engineering Ethics Dilemma," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, January 2001, pp. 137-142.
3. Harris, C.E., Pritchard, M.S., Rabins, M.J., Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, Wadsworth, 2000.
4. The Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, http://onlineethics.org.
5. Rachels, J.A., The Elements of Moral Philosophy, Mc-Graw-Hill, 1999.
6. "Understanding Note-taking Strategies," The Teaching Professor, Vol. 13, No. 9, November 1999, p. 3.