Some methodological and training/funding perspective on the future of personality research

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 640-648

  West, Stephen G ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036948370     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00516-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Millsap (2001, August). Statistics, measurement, and methods training: Survey of 210 PhD programs. In L. S. Aiken (Chair), Symposium: Methodological training for PhD psychologists-current status, needs, potential mechanisms. San Francisco: American Psychological Association.
2. Beauchaine, T. P., & Beauchaine, R. J. (2002). A comparison of maximum covariance and k-means cluster analysis in classifying cases into known taxon groups. Psychological Methods, 7, 245-261.
3. Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2000). Personality coherence: Moderating self-other profile agreement and profile consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 425-437.
4. Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Kwok, O.-M. (in press). Methodological issues in the study of personality development. Journal of Personality.
5. Clogg, C. C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 311-359). New York: Plenum.
6. Collins, L. M., & Sayer, A. G. (Eds.). (2001). New methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association books.
7. Davison, M. L., & Davenport Jr., E. C. (in press). Identifying criterion-related patterns of predictor scores using multiple regression. Psychological Methods.
8. Eizenman, D. R., Nesselroade, J. R., Featherman, D. L., & Rowe, J. W. (1997). Intraindividual variability in perceived control in an older sample: The MacArthur successful aging studies. Psychology and Aging, 12, 489-502.
9. Embretson, S., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Greenland, S., & Morgenstern, H. (1989). Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. International Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 269-274.
11. Kessler, R. C., Gilman, S. E., Kendler, K. S., & Thornton, L. M. (in press). Health, well-being, and social responsibility in the MIDUS twin and sibling subsamples. In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), A portrait of midlife in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Khoo, S.-T., & West, S. G. (in preparation). Longitudinal assessment methods. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of psychological measurement: A multimethod perspective. Washington, DC: Americqn Psychological Association books.
13. McArdle, J. J., Ferrer-Caja, E., Hamagami, F., & Woodcock, R. W. (2002). Comparative longitudinal structure analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Developmental Psychology, 38, 115-142.
14. Neale, M. C., & Stevenson, J. (1989). Rater bias in the EASI temperament scales: A twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 446-455, erratum 56, 845.
15. Ozer, D. J. (1986). Consistency in personality: A methodological framework. New York: Springer.
16. Runyan, W. M. (1983). Idiographic goals and methods in the study of lives. Journal of Personality, 51, 413-443.