Primary study on the possible width and displacement of a future surface rupture zone produced by a buried active fault

Dizhen Dizhi

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 484-494

  Han, Zhu Jun ^a   Ran, Yong Kang ^a   Xu, Xi Wei ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Buried active fault; Surface rupture zone; Width

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE FAULT; BURIAL (GEOLOGY); DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; STRIKE-SLIP FAULT;

EID: 0036944252     PISSN: 02534967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. DENG Qi-dong, YU Gui-hua, YE Wen-hua. 1992. Study on parameters of earthquake surface ruptures and their relationship with magnitudes [A] In: Institute of Geology, SSB (ed). Research on Active Fault (2). Seismological Press, Beijing. 247-264 (in Chinese).
2. LIU Chang-quan, JIA Shi-xu. 1986. Structural features of crust and upper-mantle in Tangshan earthquake region [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 8(4): 341-352 (in Chinese).
3. LU Zao-xun. 1985. Geophysical survey in Haicheng earthquake region [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 1(1): 56-65 (in Chinese).
4. WANG Guo-quan. 2001. The features of the near-surface movement caused by the Taiwan Jiji earthquake, China [D]. Ph D thesis. Institute of Geology, China Seismological Bureau, Beijing (in Chinese).
5. XU Xi-wei, YU Gui-hua, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2002. Evidence and methods for determining the safety distance from the potential earthquake surface rupture on active fault [J]. Seismology and Geology, 24(4) :470-483 (in Chinese).
6. Expert Group of China Seismological Bureau to Turkey for Earthquake Site Investigation. 2000. Some enlightenment gained from the Izmit earthquake [J]. Recent Development in World Seismology, 1: 24-27 (in Chinese).
7. Ministry of Construction of the People's Republic of China, State Quality Inspection-Quarantine Bureau. 2001. The Regulations of Seismic Design of Buildings (GB50011-2001) [M]. China Architectural Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
8. Deng J, Sykes L R. 1997a. Evolution of the stress field in southern California and triggering of moderate-size earthquakes: A 200-year perspective [J]. J Geophys Res, 102: 9859-9886.
9. Deng J, Sykes L R. 1997b. Stress evolution in southern California and triggering of moderate-, small-, and microsize earthquakes [J]. J Geophys Res. 102: 24411-24435.
10. Harris R A, Simpson R W. 1992. Changes in static stress on southern California faults after the 1992 Landers earthquake [J]. Nature, 360: 251-254.
11. Hill D P, Reasenberg P A, Michael A, et al. 1993. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake [J]. Science, 260: 1617-1623.
12. Kilb D, Gomberg J, Bodin P. 2000. Earthquake triggering by dynamic stresses [J]. Nature, 408: 570-574.
13. McGinty P, Darby D. 2001. Earthquake triggering in the Hawke's Bay, New Zealand, region from 1931 to 1934 as inferred from elastic dislocation and static stress modeling [J]. J Geophys Res, 106(B11): 26593-26604.
14. Okada Y. 1992. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space [J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 82: 1018-1040.
15. Pinar A, Honkura Y, Kuge K. 2001. Seismic activity triggered by the 1999 Izmit earthquake and its implications for the assessment of future seismic risk [J]. Geophys J Int, 146: F1-F7.
16. Stein R S, King G C P, Lin J. 1992. Change in failure stress on the southern San Andreas Fault system caused by the 1992 magnitude = 7.4 Landers earthquake [J]. Science, 258: 1328-1332.
17. Stein R S, King G C P, Lin J. 1994. Stress triggering of the 1994 M = 6.7 Northridge, California earthquake by its predecessors [J]. Science, 265: 1432-1435.
18. Stein R S, Barka A A, Dieterich J H. 1997. Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering [J]. Geophys J Int. 128: 594-604.
19. Stein R S. 1999. The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence [J]. Science, 402: 605-609.
20. w = 6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities [J]. J Geophys Res, 103(B10): 24543-24566.
21. Wells D L, Coppersmith K J. 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement [J]. Bull Seis Soc Am, 84: 974-1002.