Comparison of quantification techniques for dynamic contrast enhancement MRI analyzed using MR mammography;Methodenvergleich zur quantifizierung der kontrastmittelanreicherung am beispiel der dynamischen MR-mammographie

Radiologe

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 280-290

  Knopp, M V ^a,b   Himmelhan, N ^c   Radeleff, J ^c   Junkermann, H ^c   Hess T ^c   Sinn, H P ^c   Brix, G ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Comparative study; Gadolinium chelate; MR mammography; Quantification; ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM CHELATE;

ANGIOGENESIS; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TECHNIQUE;

BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036944013     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-002-0728-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allgayer B, Lukas P, Loos W, Muhlbauer K (1991) Die Treffsicherheit der KST-Diagnostik für die Früherkennung des Mammakarzinoms bei mammographisch und klinisch unklaren Fällen. Diagnostische Problemfälle. Röntgenpraxis 44:368-371
2. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, Schad LR, Layer G, Lorenz WJ (1991) Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:621-628
3. Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Vieweg I, Grabbe E (1993) Signalverhalten maligner und benigner Läsionen in der dynamischen 2D-MRT der Mamma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 158:287-292
4. Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Kopka L, Kahlen O, Grabbe E (1996) Kontrastmittelgestützte dynamische MR-Mammographie nach diagnostischen und therapeutischen Eingriffen an der Mamma. Bildgebung 63:94-100
5. Fletcher BD, Hanna SL, Fairclough DL, Gronemeyer SA (1992) Pediatric musculoskeletal tumors: use of dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR imaging to monitor response to chemotherapy. Radiology 184:243-248
6. Funke M, Fischer U, Grabbe E (1996) MR-Mammographie: Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven. Aktuelle Radiol 6:130-135
7. Furman HE, Margalit R, Grobgeld D, Degani H (1996) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging reveals stress-induced angiogenesis in MCF7 human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:6247-6251
8. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O et al. (1994) Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging [published erratum appears in Radiology 1994 Oct;193(1):285]. Radiology 191:625-631
9. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Evans WP, Harries SA, Brown S (1994) MR imaging of the breast: current status and future potential. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:1039-1047
10. Hawighorst H, Engenhart R, Knopp MV et al. (1997) Intracranial meningeomas: time- and dose-dependent effects of irradiation on tumor microcirculation monitored by dynamic MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 15:423-432
11. Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Schaeffer U et al. (1996) Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:401-408
12. Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W et al. (1996) Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. Radiology 201:531-539
13. Hawighorst H, Knopp MV, Debus J et al. (1998) Pharmacokinetic MRI for assessment of malignant glioma response to stereotactic radiotherapy: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:783-788
14. Heywang KS, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. EurJ Radiol 24:94-108
15. Heywang SH, Fenzl G, Hahn D et al. (1986) MR imaging of the breast: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10:615-620
16. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171:95-103
17. Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV, Hess T, Lorenz WJ (1995) Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 33:506-514
18. Kaiser WA (1993) MR-Mammographie. Radiologe 33:292-299
19. Kaiser WA (1996) MR-Mammographie - eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Fortschr Röntgenstr 165:425-427
20. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E (1989) MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 170:681-686
21. Knopp MV (1995) Funktionelle Magnetresonanztomographie und Spektroskopie der weiblichen Brust. Med. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Heidelberg
22. Knopp MV, Hoffmann U, Brix G, Hawighorst H, Junkermann HJ, van Kaick G (1995) Schnelle MR-Kontrastmitteldynamik zur Charakterisierung von Tumoren. Erfahrungen bei der funktionellen MR-Mammographie. Radiologe 35:964-972
23. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP et al. (1999) Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:260-266
24. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Lutterbey G, Sommer T, Keller E, Schild HH (1996) Standardisierung und Beschleunigung der quantitativen Analyse dynamischer MR-Mammographien durch Parameterbilder und automatisierte ROI-Definition. Fortschr R6ntgenstr 164:475-482
25. Kuhl CK, Seibert C, Sommer T, Kreft B, Gieseke J, Schild HH (1995) Fokale und diffuse Läsionen in der dynamischen MR-Mammographie gesunder Probandinnen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 163:219-224
26. Metz CE (1986) ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 21:720-733
27. Muller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Sand J, Stoll P, Claussen CD (1997) Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine? J Magn Reson Imaging 7:236-240
28. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13-30
29. Reddick WE, Taylor JS, Fletcher BD (1999) Dynamic MR imaging (DEMRI) of microcirculation in bone sarcoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:277-285
30. Reddick WE, Wang S, Xiong X et al. (2001) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of regional contrast access as an additional prognostic factor in pediatric osteosarcoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 91:2230-2237
31. Sittek H, Kessler M, Heuck AF et al. (1996) Dynamische MR-Mammographie: Ist der Verlauf der Signalintensitätszunahme zur Differenzierung unterschiedlicher Formen der Mastopathie geeignet? Fortschr Röntgenstr 165:59-63
32. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095-1102
33. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL et al. (1999) Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:223-232
34. Vining DJ, Gladish GW (1992) Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding. Radiographics 12:1147-1154
35. Weinreb JC, Newstead G (1995) MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 196:593-610