Comparison of two different posterior approachs for hemiarthroplasty of the hip

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 51-52

  Martinez A A ^a   Herrera, A ^a   Cuenca, J ^a   Panisello, J J ^a   Tabuenca, A ^b  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MIGUEL SERVET   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL SAN JORGE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Femoral neck fracture; Hemiarthroplasty; Posterior approach

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FEMUR SHAFT FRACTURE; FEMUR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; HEMATOMA; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT STABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PIRIFORMIS MUSCLE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; WOUND DRAINAGE; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 0036943040     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004020100345     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Blewitt N, Mortimore S (1992) Outcome of dislocation after hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of the femur. Injury 23: 320-322
2. Iyer KM (1982) A new posterior approach to the hip joint. Injury 13: 76-80
3. Paton RW, Hirst P (1989) Hemiarthroplasty of the hip and dislocation. Injury 20: 167-169
4. Unwin AJ, Thomas M (1994) Dislocation after hemiarthroplasty of the hip: a comparison of the dislocation rate after posterior and lateral approaches to the hip. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76: 327-329
5. Williams CRP, Kernohan JG, Sherry PG (1997) A more stable posterior approach for hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Injury 28: 279-281